The problem that nobody will take a position on is this:
Is the metadata on an image file, or on an image?
Even---or especially if---you stick to DC, you have a problem about what things are part of a description. If the metadata is about the file, then it is reasonable to express, e.g. that it has 1200x800 pixels, encoded as jpeg but perhaps not that it is a a picture of a flea biting a dog. If the image is being described, the reverse might hold.
Even if you are content to have folksonomies, i.e. tags, ---which is probably about the best you can hope for in dc:description--- you would find it only of very rare utility to search for "description contains '1200x800'. On the other hand, rendering clients probably desperately need the pixel size and also information about where to find other sizes of the "same" image.
This particular example is a little forced since most digital image formats actually encode the pixel size of the image within the file to aid decoding it for rendering, but the point remains.
I've put this whining in http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/bin/view/Image/ImageOrImageFile
...
http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#H2
The problem is that there are no tags to point to a thumbnail. There
is the Image vocabulary type, but that doesn't let a client distinguish between the actual, full size image and a thumbnail (not sure if that's a helpful distinction anyway). To accommodate that, we should create our own term for referring to thumbnails.
Does that sound like a feasible approach to solve this issue? Does
the imaging group have any better solution to this problem?
Cheers,
Ricardo
Greg Riccardi wrote:
The LSID Applicability statement includes brief coverage, in Section 10, of citation styles that describe how to format the LSID for inclusion in pages. The statement does not include how to use LSIDs to create appropriate citations in Web pages or other documents that refer to the referenced digital object.
For example, a Web application has an LSID reference to a Morphbank image to be used in generating a Web page. The value of the LSID is of secondary importance to the image itself and its metadata. The page needs to include a version of the image, or a description of the image, that is supported by a URL that presents more detail about the referenced object. A typical presentation is a thumbnail of the image and some descriptive text. Clicking on the image or text directs the user to more detail about the image. The LSID is not directly useful for this application. The page generator will use the LSID to fetch the metadata and then use the metadata to generate the citations. The metadata should include text to be used in the citation and URLs that provide standard views of the object. In the case of images, a URL for a thumbnail image to be used in an image tag and a URL for a standard presentation should be included.
The issue is much more general. The presentation to a user of a reference to a digital object needs to be useful to the user. The LSID has no semantics and so is not useful. The general problem occurs in any digital repository and is a subject of study within the digital library community. The repository needs to provide standard language to be used in making a readable citation to one of its LSIDs.
As a producer of LSIDs, the Morphbank system will provide a suggestion as to the appropriate citation text, URLs that are appropriate for use in image tags, the URL of the standard presentation of the object, and copyright information. The page generation application can rely on finding standard metadata tags for use in its pages.
I advocate that the applicability document include metadata standards for presentation of (at least) the suggested citation text, and the URL for the standard presentation.
Greg
Greg Riccardi Professor of the College of Information riccardi@ci.fsu.edu Florida State University 850-644-2869 Tallahassee, FL 32306-2100 http://www.ci.fsu.edu/riccardi
tdwg-guid mailing list tdwg-guid@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-guid
tdwg-guid mailing list tdwg-guid@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-guid