At risk of sounding like a broken record (there's an anachronism for
you),
I understand what we can gain by using semantic tools. I still have
not clearly
understood what we gain by RDF. What is wrong with simply tagging
the schema
elements with id attributes (or even rdf attributes - schema-schema
is defined
to support attributes from any other namespace) and then have an
external
ontology based on this?
Gregor----------------------------------------------------------
Gregor Hagedorn (G.Hagedorn@bba.de)
Institute for Plant Virology, Microbiology, and Biosafety
Federal Research Center for Agriculture and Forestry (BBA)
Königin-Luise-Str. 19 Tel: +49-30-8304-2220
14195 Berlin, Germany Fax: +49-30-8304-2203
... this is essentially the approach taken by GML, and if I
understand correctly, by ISO 19109. However, I do not know of tools
that validate the internal semantic consistency of GML expressions or
ISO 19109-compliant models.
Flip
_______________________________________________
Tdwg-tag mailing list
Tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag_lists.tdwg.org