Hi,
Is there a preferred slide
template for the workshop? Otherwise, I will just use the basic IBM
template.
- Ben
Taxonomic Databases Working Group GUID Project <TDWG-GUID@LISTSERV.NHM.KU.EDU>
wrote on 01/20/2006 07:48:06 AM:
> Ben,
>
> Thank you very much for sharing the outline of your
presentation
> with us. It certainly seems ideal for our purposes.
>
> We would be very interested in picking your brains on
wider semantic
> interoperability issues during the workshop.
>
> Regarding LSIDs specifically, our biggest challange
is to find an
> appropriate way to define stable byte-identical data for our objects.
We
> have therefore been thinking mostly of turning everything to metadata.
> We would be very interested in knowing what your thoughts are regarding
> that issue.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ricardo
>
> Benjamin H Szekely wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi All,
> > Thank you again for including me in your workshop.
From reading
> > Rod's paper and many of the following comments, it seems that
this
> > community is certainly on the right track and shares a similar
vision
> > for LSIDs and metadata to that of our development team here in
> > Cambridge, MA. I encourage anybody to ask questions on
the list about
> > LSID or Semantic Web technology in general. Our team has
been elbow
> > deep in the Semantic Web for 3 years and have been working on
a wide
> > variety of projects outside of LSID including Storage and replication,
> > annotation, workflow, and RDF-based user interfaces,
> >
> > I am tentatively planning to organize my talk as follows:
> >
> > - Overview of LSID (10-15 minutes)
> >
> > - Survey of global LSID participation (10-15 minutes)
> >
> > - Brief overview of IBM Cambridge Semantic Web projects (5 minutes)
> >
> > I am certainly open to reorganization. I'm not planning
on discussing
> > too many technical and implementation details, but I'd be happy
to
> > discuss these throughout the week at the workshop.
> >
> > - Ben