Or you could flag all of the DiGIR ones and leave TAPIR ones unflagged, the idea being that TAPIR is the common goal toward which to strive.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/2/28, Renato De Giovanni &lt;<a href="mailto:renato@cria.org.br">
renato@cria.org.br</a>&gt;:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi Donald,<br><br>This is excellent news!<br><br>Two quick questions:
<br><br>* For providers that want to migrate to TAPIR and already have data<br>indexed by GBIF from previous DiGIR/BioCASe instances, what will be the<br>recommended procedure? (will it be necessary to re-index everything or is
<br>there an easy re-configuration process on the GBIF side?). Do they need to<br>contact GBIF to&nbsp;&nbsp;specify both the new TAPIR accesspoint and the old one<br>that will be replaced or is there a way to do this just by interacting
<br>with the UDDI registry?<br><br>* On the web pages where GBIF lists providers, BioCASe/ABCD ones are<br>marked with a special flag. Can you do the same for TAPIR providers when<br>they start to pop up?<br><br>Best Regards,
<br>--<br>Renato<br><br>&gt; The new GBIF data portal can index data provided using TAPIR with<br>Dwc/Geo/Cur or ABCD 1.20/2.05/2.06.<br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>tdwg-tapir mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org">tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir">http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir</a><br></blockquote></div><br>