There has in the past been discussions about a term for this purpose (in fact I believe the proposed term was canonicalScientificName). It's been a few years, and it would take me some time to dig up the details, but my recollection of the conclusion of those discussions was along the lines of the following:
- When providers had only a "text blob" to represent the scientific name, with or without authorship, with or without rank abbreviations and formatting, etc., and these providers lacked the time, inclination, skills, and/or local data structure to parse these text blobs, then the scientificName term fulfilled their needs.
- When providers had a text blob for the name, separate from the text blob for the authorship, they could concatenate the two for presentation in scientificName, and also provide the authorship bit in scientificNameAuthorship, and the consumers could easily strip the authorship from scientificName to produce the functional equivalent of a canonical name.
- When providers did have the time, inclination, skills, and local data structure to parse these text blobs, the elements of a canonical name could be provided via the genus | subgenus | specificEpithet | infraspecificEpithet | taxonRank | verbatimTaxonRank terms, and the consumer could easily assemble these into a single string with canonical form.
This led to the conclusion that the addition of yet another term in the dwc:Taxon class would have provided very little benefit, at the cost of confusion about what information to provide in which term, and inconsistent use.
Aloha,
Rich
Richard L. Pyle, PhD
Database Coordinator for Natural Sciences
Associate Zoologist in Ichthyology
Dive Safety Officer
Department of Natural Sciences, Bishop Museum
1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, HI 96817
Ph: (808)848-4115, Fax: (808)847-8252
email:
deepreef@bishopmuseum.orghttp://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/staff/pylerichard.htmlNote: This disclaimer formally apologizes for the disclaimer below, over which I have no control.
-----Original Message-----
From: tdwg-content-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-content-
bounces@lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Peter Desmet
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 12:59 PM
To: TDWG content mailing list; Roderic D. M. Page; TDWG TAG mailing list
Subject: Re: [tdwg-content] canonicalScientificName
Sorry, forgot to include TAG mailing list.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:27, Peter Desmet <peter.desmet@umontreal.ca>
wrote:
Hi everyone,
In a recent tweet [1] Roderic Page reminded me that in Darwin Core, we
don't have a ready-to-use scientificName field. The definition for
scientificName [2] asks for the full verbose name, including authors.
I think this is a good definition (see below), but it also means that
in a lot of use cases, names need to be parsed before they can be used
or matched. I am currently helping collections publish their data for
Candensys [3] and as a data producer I am happy we can provide all the
information we have in scientificName, but as a data user, I get
frustrated every time I see those long verbose botanical names with
multiple authors. I am convinced that our data would be more usable if
we had an additional canonicalScientificName term.
Which is why I am now officially requesting it on the Darwin Core code
site: http://code.google.com/p/darwincore/issues/detail?id=150 (see
below). This has been discussed in detail before [4], but no consensus
was reached. I hope we can get our act together this time!
Regards,
Peter Desmet
--
[1] https://twitter.com/#!/rustyrussell22/status/179500954901692417
[2] http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#scientificName
[3] http://www.canadensys.net
[4]
http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/2010-
November/thread.html
#1976
==New Term Recommendation==
Submitter: Peter Desmet
Justification: The scientific name is probably the most used element
of an occurrence/taxon, but currently Darwin Core does not provide a
single ready-to-use-field for this. A canonicalScientificName with the
scientific name as a uninomial, binomial or trinomial could solve this
problem.
The current terms are not sufficient:
- scientificName: verbose, used to record all components of a
scientific name (if available), including authorship(s) and
rankmarker(s). It is critical to keep this definition, as this term is
sometimes the only place to share certain information, e.g.:
quadrinomials, intermediate botanical authors, hybrid formulas, etc.
The disadvantage of only having this verbose notation is that the user
needs to parse the name before he/she can use or match it.
- genus, specificEpithet, infraspecificEpithet: concatenated, this
terms are identical to the canonicalScientificName for genera, species
and infraspecific taxa. For higher taxa or infrageneric taxa, these
terms are not sufficient. In addition, there is some ambiguity
regarding the genus definition: for synonyms, is it the accepted genus
or the genus that is part of the synonym name? See:
http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/2010-
November/002052.html.
In the former case, the genus cannot be used to concatenate a
canonicalScientificName.
The need for this term has been discussed thoroughly already (see:
http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/2010-
November/thread.html
#1976), but no consensus was reached. I'd like to reopen the
discussion and I hope that a consensus can be reached quickly, so our
data can be used more easily.
Definition: The scientific name as a uninomial, binomial or trinomial.
When forming part of an Identification, this should be the name in
lowest level taxonomic rank that can be determined. This term should
not contain authorship(s), rankmarker(s) or identification
qualifications. If the scientific name cannot be expressed as a uni-,
bi- or trinomial (e.g. hybrid formulas), do not use this term (use
scientificName instead).
Comment: Examples: "Carex" (genus), "Vulpes vulpes" (species),
"Anaphalis margaritacea occidentalis" (plant variety)
Refines:
Has Domain:
Has Range:
Replaces:
ABCD 2.06:
--
Peter Desmet
Biodiversity Informatics Manager
Canadensys - www.canadensys.net
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centre
4101 rue Sherbrooke est
Montreal, QC, H1X2B2
Canada
Phone: 514-343-6111 #82354
Fax: 514-343-2288
Email: peter.desmet@umontreal.ca / peter.desmet.cubc@gmail.com
Skype: anderhalv
Public profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterdesmet
_______________________________________________
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
This message is only intended for the addressee named above. Its contents may be privileged or otherwise protected. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this message or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply mail or by collect telephone call. Any personal opinions expressed in this message do not necessarily represent the views of the Bishop Museum.