I like Renato's suggestion as well.
On 8/2/06, "Döring, Markus" m.doering@bgbm.org wrote:
that sounds best to me so far. yes, any other suggestion?
-- Markus
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] Im Auftrag von Renato De Giovanni Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:38 An: tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology
Markus,
How about defining a controlled vocabulary?
<operations logRequests="[required | accepted | denied]"> -- Renato
On 2 Aug 2006 at 11:23, "Döring, Markus" wrote:
hi, I am wondering about the naming for the attribute in the
capabilities that tells others if this provider wants to receive log-only requests. How should we call it?
<operations logRequestsDesired="true"> <operations logRequestsDenied="false"> <operations logRequests="true">
<operations
logRequestsAccepted="true">
From those I would opt for "logRequestsDesired".
Any preferences or different suggestions?
regards -- Markus
tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
tdwg-tapir mailing list tdwg-tapir@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir