Dear Peter,
The call to participate in the LGTG was open to everyone but,
unfortunately, for reasons already given to you and because of the need to
limit numbers to create a functional and effective work group, and to be able
to cover travel costs, the maximum number that could actually participate in the
workshop was limited. We sought to get the inputs of those individuals who expressed
interest but were not selected for the core task group through comments on
drafts of the report and all your emails, along with those from others, were
shared with the group. There was no intent to exclude any significant work –
the final report was not meant to be an exhaustive literature review of the current
state of the field – it needed to be kept concise – but I support Kevin’s
response (attached) and would be happy to see a reference to GeoSpecies in the
linked data section.
I think there will be plenty of opportunities for your
contributions as we move forward. The plan is to create a web site for the
report with facility to comment and suggest additional materials. Expansion on
some of the briefly mentioned use cases in the report is one area, for example,
that needs amplification.
Best regards,
Éamonn
From:
lgtg-bounces@lists.gbif.org [mailto:lgtg-bounces@lists.gbif.org] On Behalf
Of Peter DeVries
Sent: 15 November 2009 02:40
To: Technical Architecture Group mailing list; lgtg@lists.gbif.org
Subject: [Lgtg] Re LSID-GUID
I also thought I would also address this statement about the
LSID-GUID meeting
> The invitation to the LGTG workshop was open to
everyone.
"Thank you for your expression of interest in
participating in the GBIF LSID-GUID Task Group. Due to the need to have a mix
of skills/experience and to try to maintain a geographical spread (difficult),
it did not prove possible to include you in the core group (North America was
over-represented in the nominations)"
I have no animosity toward GBIF for this, I have just become
increasingly concerned about a growing paper trail that is amazingly similar to
my own proposals but fails to mention my work.
It seems strange to me that of all the people involved in
TDWG and Linked Data discussions over the last year my efforts seem to be being
positioned as "invisible".
- Pete
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pete DeVries
Department of Entomology
University of Wisconsin - Madison
445 Russell Laboratories
1630 Linden Drive
Madison, WI 53706
GeoSpecies Knowledge Base
About the GeoSpecies Knowledge Base
------------------------------------------------------------