Roger - is this something you had in mind tackling at the VoCamp? - hilmar
On Oct 19, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Kevin Richards wrote:
I third that. I beleive it may help though if we nut this out in some form of workshop where we can produce a core model that "merges" LSID Vocs and DwC concepts. This model could then be applied to various representations - eg an RDF represntation that is domain indepentdent, DwC RDF version (the current one), etc depending on the "use case" in question.
Kevin
From: tdwg-tag-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [tdwg-tag- bounces@lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Hilmar Lapp [hlapp@duke.edu] Sent: Monday, 19 October 2009 4:47 a.m. To: Roger Hyam Cc: Bob Morris; Technical Architecture Group mailing list Subject: Re: [tdwg-tag] Institutions are People if they own a Collection
On Oct 18, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Roger Hyam wrote:
This is why I believe we should not make assertions in the core ontology about range and domain of properties.
I'd fully second that. Guiding users of the ontology in how a term is meant to be applied should not, and does not need to infringe on the assertions entailed by that.
-hilmar
--
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
tdwg-tag mailing list tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
Please consider the environment before printing this email Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails. The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz