I agree with having a single repository for the DwC.
Can you be explicit about what you mean by replacing the /dwc? If that changes it will affect every URI in the standard. That wouldn't be so good.
The other thing to work out would be development branches.
In the meantime, I will continue to publish commits to both the code site and rs.tdwg.org Subversion repositories.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:46 AM, "Markus Döring (GBIF)" mdoering@gbif.org wrote:
Hi TAG, we had talked about proxying some of the rs.tdwg.org subversion site to different google code projects. I have setup 2 test proxies for darwin core and the new ontology project using these URLs:
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc2/terms/index.htm http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology2/
I wasnt sure if this solution was fully agreed on at TDWG, so I am seeking for advice. I very much like this solution, which gives us the advantage of having google code exposed via the tdwg.org domain. And it frees us from having to sync different copies.
If there are no objections I would love to replace the /dwc and potentially also the /ontology part of rs.tdwg.org. But before making this switch some files on google seem to need adjustments in regards of absolute/relative links and html redirects.
Markus
tdwg-tag mailing list tdwg-tag@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag