Humboldt Task Group Meeting Wed 31 March 2021, 0800 EST: homework!
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6500d8cf6957bb497a3c856f7da1b3ad.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi all,
As per our discussion at the last meeting, we have homework for next Wednesday!
Propose a definition (include comments and examples if appropriate) for the following HC terms:
-
protocolName -
The idea of this term would be to capture a -more or less- specific protocol, but without including specific details in textual form. As discussed in our last meeting this term could involve the concatenation of General Target Category + Method Approach + General Method Type + Specific Method Name from Survey Methods Definition https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ojS1gRk5MJZ5OWYuaXaGt0oFn3J-JPvpHT-0JkUNwZA/edit#gid=0 (better known as “Peter’s spreadsheet” :) ). Consider if such a term would need an associated controlled vocabulary, and if so, whether we would attempt to provide one, point to existing one(s), or leave open for future work. -
protocolDescription/protocolDetail -
As discussed in our last meeting, this term would allow users to capture detailed information about the protocol, including any deviation from the published methodologies and unpublished protocols. -
protocolReference -
From our conversation in our last meeting, it was not clear if this should be retained separately or included in protocolDescription/protocolDetail. If you feel it should be a separate term, please provide definition, comments, examples. This term would refer to formatted references and URL or direct DOI links to the protocols used.
For reference:
-
check the definitions of the original related terms in HC (see Vocabulary file https://github.com/tdwg/hc/tree/main/vocabulary: protocol name, protocol detail, protocol citation, protocol reference) -
revisit the definition of dwc:samplingProtocol https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/#dwc:samplingProtocol
*Please send your proposed definitions to me or Paula by Tuesday* so we include them in a small presentation to improve our discussions.
Thank you and see you on Wed!
LIST OF TERMS TO BE DISCUSSED NEXT WED: original_HC_label protocol name protocol detail protocol citation protocol reference effort amount upper bound effort upper bound unit effort amount lower bound effort lower bound unit If time allows we can start discussing site description terms: number of separate sites site nesting site names site details
Yanina V. Sica, PhD Data Manager | Map of Life Yale University pronouns: she/her/hers
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8acc9bed17df41a6351843fd8b5b6ff8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Thanks Yani!
This week I'm running a workshop on data mobilization for Haiti, and I had not noticed that given the recent time saving change (which Haiti follows), the workshop will start an hour earlier than I expected. Unfortunately, this means I won't be able to attend our meeting :(
I will, however, work on the compilation of definitions from everyone and can have the corresponding slides ready for everyone else to discuss. I've put the ppt file we were using in previous meetings in the HC drive folder, and have already added the site-related terms (in case you get to discuss them on Wed).
Best, paula
El dom., 28 de mar. de 2021 16:46, Yanina Sica yanina.sica@yale.edu escribió:
Hi all,
As per our discussion at the last meeting, we have homework for next Wednesday!
Propose a definition (include comments and examples if appropriate) for the following HC terms:
protocolName
The idea of this term would be to capture a -more or less- specific protocol, but without including specific details in textual form. As discussed in our last meeting this term could involve the concatenation of General Target Category + Method Approach + General Method Type + Specific Method Name from Survey Methods Definition https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ojS1gRk5MJZ5OWYuaXaGt0oFn3J-JPvpHT-0JkUNwZA/edit#gid=0 (better known as “Peter’s spreadsheet” :) ). Consider if such a term would need an associated controlled vocabulary, and if so, whether we would attempt to provide one, point to existing one(s), or leave open for future work.
protocolDescription/protocolDetail
As discussed in our last meeting, this term would allow users to capture detailed information about the protocol, including any deviation from the published methodologies and unpublished protocols.
protocolReference
From our conversation in our last meeting, it was not clear if this should be retained separately or included in protocolDescription/protocolDetail. If you feel it should be a separate term, please provide definition, comments, examples. This term would refer to formatted references and URL or direct DOI links to the protocols used.
For reference:
check the definitions of the original related terms in HC (see Vocabulary file https://github.com/tdwg/hc/tree/main/vocabulary: protocol name, protocol detail, protocol citation, protocol reference)
revisit the definition of dwc:samplingProtocol https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/#dwc:samplingProtocol
*Please send your proposed definitions to me or Paula by Tuesday* so we include them in a small presentation to improve our discussions.
Thank you and see you on Wed!
LIST OF TERMS TO BE DISCUSSED NEXT WED: original_HC_label protocol name protocol detail protocol citation protocol reference effort amount upper bound effort upper bound unit effort amount lower bound effort lower bound unit If time allows we can start discussing site description terms: number of separate sites site nesting site names site details
Yanina V. Sica, PhD Data Manager | Map of Life Yale University pronouns: she/her/hers
tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/475d1a274f78716542d77c6497a24d43.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Thanks Yani and Paula,
I have added a google doc to the team folder with some thoughts. You can find it at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TRpgRADU4CluwjHYie7JyAzx6IshCtTm/view?usp=s...
Cheers
Peter
From: tdwg-humboldt tdwg-humboldt-bounces@lists.tdwg.org On Behalf Of Paula Zermoglio Sent: Monday, 29 March 2021 10:15 AM To: Humboldt Core TG tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org Subject: Re: [tdwg-humboldt] Humboldt Task Group Meeting Wed 31 March 2021, 0800 EST: homework!
Thanks Yani!
This week I'm running a workshop on data mobilization for Haiti, and I had not noticed that given the recent time saving change (which Haiti follows), the workshop will start an hour earlier than I expected. Unfortunately, this means I won't be able to attend our meeting :(
I will, however, work on the compilation of definitions from everyone and can have the corresponding slides ready for everyone else to discuss. I've put the ppt file we were using in previous meetings in the HC drive folder, and have already added the site-related terms (in case you get to discuss them on Wed).
Best, paula
El dom., 28 de mar. de 2021 16:46, Yanina Sica <yanina.sica@yale.edumailto:yanina.sica@yale.edu> escribió:
Hi all,
As per our discussion at the last meeting, we have homework for next Wednesday!
Propose a definition (include comments and examples if appropriate) for the following HC terms:
* protocolName
* The idea of this term would be to capture a -more or less- specific protocol, but without including specific details in textual form. As discussed in our last meeting this term could involve the concatenation of General Target Category + Method Approach + General Method Type + Specific Method Name from Survey Methods Definitionhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ojS1gRk5MJZ5OWYuaXaGt0oFn3J-JPvpHT-0JkUNwZA/edit#gid=0 (better known as “Peter’s spreadsheet” :) ). Consider if such a term would need an associated controlled vocabulary, and if so, whether we would attempt to provide one, point to existing one(s), or leave open for future work.
* protocolDescription/protocolDetail
* As discussed in our last meeting, this term would allow users to capture detailed information about the protocol, including any deviation from the published methodologies and unpublished protocols.
* protocolReference
* From our conversation in our last meeting, it was not clear if this should be retained separately or included in protocolDescription/protocolDetail. If you feel it should be a separate term, please provide definition, comments, examples. This term would refer to formatted references and URL or direct DOI links to the protocols used.
For reference:
* check the definitions of the original related terms in HC (see Vocabulary filehttps://github.com/tdwg/hc/tree/main/vocabulary: protocol name, protocol detail, protocol citation, protocol reference) * revisit the definition of dwc:samplingProtocolhttps://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/#dwc:samplingProtocol
Please send your proposed definitions to me or Paula by Tuesday so we include them in a small presentation to improve our discussions.
Thank you and see you on Wed!
LIST OF TERMS TO BE DISCUSSED NEXT WED: original_HC_label protocol name protocol detail protocol citation protocol reference effort amount upper bound effort upper bound unit effort amount lower bound effort lower bound unit
If time allows we can start discussing site description terms: number of separate sites site nesting site names site details
Yanina V. Sica, PhD Data Manager | Map of Life Yale University pronouns: she/her/hers
_______________________________________________ tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.orgmailto:tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
participants (3)
-
Brenton, Peter (NCMI, Black Mountain)
-
Paula Zermoglio
-
Yanina Sica