Should I add "identifiedBy" for absence data?
Hello,
Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data?
The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species with occurrenceStatus == “absent”.
If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension, does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as those absence records in occurrence extension?
Thank you so much for your help!!
Cheers Ming
To me it makes sense to do so. I think of it as, "Who said so with respect to identifications."
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yi Ming Gan ymgan@naturalsciences.be wrote:
Hello,
Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data?
The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species with occurrenceStatus == “absent”.
If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension, does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as those absence records in occurrence extension?
Thank you so much for your help!!
Cheers Ming
tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
Perfect! Thank you so much John! I will go as you advised! Have a great week!
Get Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef ________________________________ From: tdwg-humboldt tdwg-humboldt-bounces@lists.tdwg.org on behalf of John Wieczorek tuco@berkeley.edu Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 4:04:22 AM To: Humboldt Core TG tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org Subject: Re: [tdwg-humboldt] Should I add "identifiedBy" for absence data?
To me it makes sense to do so. I think of it as, "Who said so with respect to identifications."
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yi Ming Gan <ymgan@naturalsciences.bemailto:ymgan@naturalsciences.be> wrote: Hello,
Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data?
The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species with occurrenceStatus == “absent”.
If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension, does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as those absence records in occurrence extension?
Thank you so much for your help!!
Cheers Ming
_______________________________________________ tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.orgmailto:tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldthttps://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.tdwg.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftdwg-humboldt&data=05%7C01%7Cymgan%40naturalsciences.be%7C1a928bd23d794308c5cf08da3c609788%7C4da8d35db472419c9e15665786aadbfb%7C1%7C0%7C637888682967613371%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=AjLZDG1zii%2FSl4mta3Cd%2FCk1VRFfVOWBFNLUWnnqjsA%3D&reserved=0
I agree with John because it makes it clear that a particular person looked and can report absence. Rob
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 2:01 AM Yi Ming Gan ymgan@naturalsciences.be wrote:
Perfect! Thank you so much John! I will go as you advised! Have a great week!
Get Outlook for iOS https://aka.ms/o0ukef
*From:* tdwg-humboldt tdwg-humboldt-bounces@lists.tdwg.org on behalf of John Wieczorek tuco@berkeley.edu *Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2022 4:04:22 AM *To:* Humboldt Core TG tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org *Subject:* Re: [tdwg-humboldt] Should I add "identifiedBy" for absence data?
To me it makes sense to do so. I think of it as, "Who said so with respect to identifications."
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yi Ming Gan ymgan@naturalsciences.be wrote:
Hello,
Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data?
The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species with occurrenceStatus == “absent”.
If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension, does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as those absence records in occurrence extension?
Thank you so much for your help!!
Cheers Ming
tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.tdwg.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftdwg-humboldt&data=05%7C01%7Cymgan%40naturalsciences.be%7C1a928bd23d794308c5cf08da3c609788%7C4da8d35db472419c9e15665786aadbfb%7C1%7C0%7C637888682967613371%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=AjLZDG1zii%2FSl4mta3Cd%2FCk1VRFfVOWBFNLUWnnqjsA%3D&reserved=0
tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
participants (3)
-
John Wieczorek -
Rob Stevenson -
Yi Ming Gan