Should I add "identifiedBy" for absence data?
Hello, Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data? The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species with occurrenceStatus == “absent”. If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension, does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as those absence records in occurrence extension? Thank you so much for your help!! Cheers Ming
To me it makes sense to do so. I think of it as, "Who said so with respect to identifications." On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yi Ming Gan <ymgan@naturalsciences.be> wrote:
Hello,
Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data?
The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species with occurrenceStatus == “absent”.
If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension, does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as those absence records in occurrence extension?
Thank you so much for your help!!
Cheers Ming
_______________________________________________ tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
Perfect! Thank you so much John! I will go as you advised! Have a great week! Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: tdwg-humboldt <tdwg-humboldt-bounces@lists.tdwg.org> on behalf of John Wieczorek <tuco@berkeley.edu> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 4:04:22 AM To: Humboldt Core TG <tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org> Subject: Re: [tdwg-humboldt] Should I add "identifiedBy" for absence data? To me it makes sense to do so. I think of it as, "Who said so with respect to identifications." On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yi Ming Gan <ymgan@naturalsciences.be<mailto:ymgan@naturalsciences.be>> wrote: Hello, Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data? The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species with occurrenceStatus == “absent”. If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension, does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as those absence records in occurrence extension? Thank you so much for your help!! Cheers Ming _______________________________________________ tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org<mailto:tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.tdwg.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftdwg-humboldt&data=05%7C01%7Cymgan%40naturalsciences.be%7C1a928bd23d794308c5cf08da3c609788%7C4da8d35db472419c9e15665786aadbfb%7C1%7C0%7C637888682967613371%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=AjLZDG1zii%2FSl4mta3Cd%2FCk1VRFfVOWBFNLUWnnqjsA%3D&reserved=0>
I agree with John because it makes it clear that a particular person looked and can report absence. Rob On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 2:01 AM Yi Ming Gan <ymgan@naturalsciences.be> wrote:
Perfect! Thank you so much John! I will go as you advised! Have a great week!
Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ------------------------------ *From:* tdwg-humboldt <tdwg-humboldt-bounces@lists.tdwg.org> on behalf of John Wieczorek <tuco@berkeley.edu> *Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2022 4:04:22 AM *To:* Humboldt Core TG <tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org> *Subject:* Re: [tdwg-humboldt] Should I add "identifiedBy" for absence data?
To me it makes sense to do so. I think of it as, "Who said so with respect to identifications."
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yi Ming Gan <ymgan@naturalsciences.be> wrote:
Hello,
Maybe a silly question - should I add “identifiedBy” to absence data?
The scientists specifically look for a species in the catch from the trawl and found none of them, so there are occurrence records with such species with occurrenceStatus == “absent”.
If I have an event which only has absence data in occurrence extension, does it make sense to add “identifiedBy” for Humboldt Extension as well as those absence records in occurrence extension?
Thank you so much for your help!!
Cheers Ming
_______________________________________________ tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.tdwg.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftdwg-humboldt&data=05%7C01%7Cymgan%40naturalsciences.be%7C1a928bd23d794308c5cf08da3c609788%7C4da8d35db472419c9e15665786aadbfb%7C1%7C0%7C637888682967613371%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=AjLZDG1zii%2FSl4mta3Cd%2FCk1VRFfVOWBFNLUWnnqjsA%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________ tdwg-humboldt mailing list tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
-- Robert D Stevenson Associate Professor Department of Biology UMass Boston
participants (3)
-
John Wieczorek -
Rob Stevenson -
Yi Ming Gan