I have been amending my example dataset and I have a couple of questions:
- should I publish the dataset on the test IPT under a publishing organization so that it is registered to GBIF dev portal? Because I currently
published it under “no organization” so
it is not registered with GBIF (dev portal). If I should publish under an organization, which one should it be?
- There are actually many absence data (scientist looked for the specific species in the catch, but found none of them) that was not included in the dataset, but I don’t have the time to add all those data in. Is it okay for me to just add these absence
occurrence records for 1 single trawl event as an example and put that in the documentation?
- The same issue for abundance data. Can I just add the abundance data for 1 event and document that in the documentation?
Thank you so much everyone for your hard work!!
Cheers
Ming
Thanks sounds great, Yani. Thanks!
Hi all,
There is still quite some work to be done on the
documentation and I could use our meeting time to work on it. I also know that some of you might not be able to make it to our meeting, so I suggest
we cancel it.
Unless there is a topic we need to discuss as a group I suggest we keep advancing on the documentation over
email, is this ok?
Below you can find some of the topics that are still unresolved and we could use some help:
- Humboldt
Extension Quick Reference Guide
-
Steve and John are working on it
- can
we agree to use the 6 Humboldt categories as pseudo-classes (not real classes but to organize the terms)?
-
Section Mapping data - A multi-layered approach needs some wrangling
-
Kate, Pete and I are working on improving the figure/table BUT more feedback is very welcome!
-
Example section
- thanks to Ming we have a great and very complex
example dataset using the extension, can somebody else contribute with an example?
-
Zach, I know you probably have a lot on your plate with the FM, do you think you would be able to add the rapid inventory example? I added a figure and
I can help describing the case if needed, let me know!
-
General revision needed
-
We have been making some executive decisions to the document so it would be great if you can review it and share your thoughts!
-
Last looks: Formatting, homogenize concepts (eg. DwC vs DwC standard, inventory vs survey), figure numbers, etc
We also need to make some decision on the testers. See
here the candidate list that we need to refine.
Hope this works for you, otherwise let me know!
cheers,
Yani
Yanina V. Sica, PhD
Lead Data Team
Yale University
pronouns: she/her/hers
_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list
tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt
--
------------------------------
Kate Ingenloff, PhD
Pronouns: she/her(s)
Data Curator, Map of Life
970.568.2672
"When one tugs at a single thread in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world." ~John Muir
_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list
tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt