Thank you John!! Indeed, it was a very successful Task Group!!

One question, do you think we can already close the Task Group even if we have not delivered the 7 datasets mapped to Humboldt extension?

Ani is having a hard time with her very complex dataset. So, if it is not truly needed, maybe we can share the Field Museum and the eBird dataset as csv (already done by Zach and Wesley) and the MOL and Antarctic datasets via IPT (already done by Kate and Ming). What do you think?

Yani

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 7:33 PM John Wieczorek <gtuco.btuco@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi folks,

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 6:01 AM Yanina Sica <yanina.sica@gmail.com> wrote:

• John, is it possible to have the GBIF IPT updated with eco: terms so we can share these datasets using it?

Steve and I have finished updating Humboldt to a) include the ecoiri: term equivalents as appropriate, b) update the corresponding eco: terms to include references to their ecoiri: equivalents, c) remove the comments recommending to the unit ontology as we find it unusable as it currently stands, d) integrated the Humboldt documents on tdwg.org with the Darwin Core menu system so one can navigate seamlessly between Darwin Core and its extensions, e) updated the XML extension definition for the IPT, and f) requested GBIF to move the Humboldt Extension into production so that it can be used in production versions of the IPT. I think, with all of this behind us, we have done everything needed for Humboldt Extension until which time it is ready to evolve.

Cheers to all for an effective and successful Task Group!

_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list
tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
https://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt

_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list
tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
https://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt