Hi,
Decision this week sounds excellent. If formal criteria for ratification are met, then the decision should follow? Hopefully signals from iDiv are supportive. There is some work on the GBIF side, including on the guide, which will start
only after ratification by TDWG.
Thanks
Dmitry
From: tdwg-humboldt <tdwg-humboldt-bounces@lists.tdwg.org>
On Behalf Of Yanina Sica
Sent: Monday, 8 January, 2024 08:05
To: Humboldt Core TG <tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org>
Cc: Wesley M. Hochachka <wmh6@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: [tdwg-humboldt] Humboldt Task Group Meeting Wed 3 Jan 2024, 12:00 UTC
Hi all!
Thanks for your emails, John and Steve.
We met with Rob, Ming and Wesley to catch up and summarize what was done last year.
There was no new activity in GitHub so I guess we reached consensus. However, We are still waiting for Ani’s (and iDiv’s) feedback.
My proposal is to wait until our meeting this week to make a decision. It would be crucial for Ani to be in the meeting and share (at least briefly) her impressions from the discussions with her group. If nothing serious comes up
then I think we are ready to move forward.
Ani, John, will you be able to join our meeting on Wednesday?
Thanks all and hope to started a great 2024!!
Best!
Yani
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:33 PM John Wieczorek <gtuco.btuco@gmail.com> wrote: