Hi group,

Thanks for the good meeting this morning. I have been through the feedback form and it looks clear and on target. There is just one question on the page, "After completing the mapping exercise" for which I have a suggestion. In place of 

"How likely are you to implement the Humboldt extension in your data management system?"

I suggest

"How likely is it that the Humboldt extension will affect your data management practices?"

Good job!

John

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:16 AM Sica, Yanina <yanina.sica@yale.edu> wrote:
Hi all,

Hope everyone is doing well.

First, big Kudos to Tim and John for a great webinar on Diversifying the GBIF data model.  
They not only gave a very clear introduction to the new "GBIF Grand Unified Model" but they also actively invited people to join our TG and test our proposal! Thank you!

Second, John has agreed to help us with the test IPT for the Humboldt extension. This would be very valuable for our testing subgroup, but we thought it would be a good idea to open this to everybody who is interested. Hence, tomorrow in our typical Wed meeting we will have some time to ask John questions regarding the IPT (and potentially how the new unified data model could impact that work).

There has also been a lot of progress in the Humboldt documentation and the testing feedback form, that would greatly benefit from your comments!

Below you will find the proposed agenda for tomorrow:
  • Are we ready for external testing of Humboldt extension?
    • specific IPT questions (questions for John)
    • Any comments on the documentation and feedback form? 
    • have we identified external testers?
  • How can the working group have an active participation in TDWG 2022?
    • Deadline is this Friday!
All the best!

Yani


Yanina V. Sica, PhD
Lead Data Team
Yale University
pronouns: she/her/hers
_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list
tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt