Hi All,

Based on discussions last week and the comments left by Dmitry regarding the title and audience for this manuscript, it is hard to orient the paper until we have a consensus on the audience

I favor trying to reach a broad audience of scientists who design studies and collect data rather than the data managers who are likely to use the Humboldt core.

To that end, the paper should announces the accomplishment of the new standard

Something such as

GBIF moves beyond archiving presence-only data: Capturing the scope and effort of surveys and inventories

Thoughts about the orientation of the paper?

Suggestions for titles?

Rob

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 7:24 AM Yanina Sica <yanina.sica@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear all,

Last week we had a great meeting where we discussed the advances on the HE manuscript (here). We are still working on this first draft, in particular, we are still drafting the discussion and the figures. I will start assigning some sections for you to review or write from scratch. Please let me know if you do not feel comfortable with these assignments.

One key item that we discussed is that we would like to switch the terminology to 'surveys'. This would be the main way to refer to a sampling event. Although 'inventory' and 'sampling' will also be used along the text. Somewhere we will need to add a paragraph saying that we will use the terms interchangeably.

I do not think we need to meet today, but the link is open and feel free to use it to discuss any particular matter. Thanks, John for those great visuals on the events, I encourage you to meet and keep discussing this topic.

All the best,

Yani
_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list -- tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tdwg-humboldt-leave@lists.tdwg.org