HE paper is certianly bigger than GBIF (GBIF should not be in the title imho)

Look what I found, too, did anybody read these?

Bledsoe Ellen K.,  Burant Joseph B., Higino Gracielle T., Roche Dominique G., Binning Sandra A.,  Finlay Kerri, Pither Jason,  Pollock Laura S., Sunday Jennifer M. and Srivastava Diane S. 2022. Data rescue: saving environmental data from extinction. Proc. R. Soc. B.28920220938 http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0938

Roche DG, Berberi I, Dhane F, Lauzon F, Soeharjono S, Dakin R, Binning SA. 2022 Slow improvements to the archiving quality of open datasets in evolution and ecology. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20212780. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2021.2780)

Roche DG, Kruuk LEB, Lanfear R, Binning SA (2015) Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing? PLoS Biol 13 (11): e1002295. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295

From: Guralnick,Robert <rguralnick@flmnh.ufl.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 October, 2024 15:19
To: Humboldt Core TG <tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org>
Cc: Wesley M. Hochachka <wmh6@cornell.edu>; steve.baskauf@gmail.com
Subject: [tdwg-humboldt] Re: no meeting for me - working on the MS

Kate is working on a data publishing guide for Humboldt Extension so I think the audience should surely be on "broad audience of scientists who design studies and collect data."  Just my 2 quick cents (maybe it is 1 cent in this case?)

---

From: Rob Stevenson <rdstevenson10@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2024 9:08 AM
To: Humboldt Core TG <tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org>
Cc: Wesley M. Hochachka <wmh6@cornell.edu>; steve.baskauf@gmail.com <steve.baskauf@gmail.com>
Subject: [tdwg-humboldt] Re: no meeting for me - working on the MS

[External Email]

Hi All,

Based on discussions last week and the comments left by Dmitry regarding the title and audience for this manuscript, it is hard to orient the paper until we have a consensus on the audience

 I favor trying to reach a broad audience of scientists who design studies and collect data rather than the data managers who are likely to use the Humboldt core.

To that end, the paper should announces the accomplishment of the new standard

Something such as

GBIF moves beyond archiving presence-only data: Capturing the scope and effort of surveys and inventories

Thoughts about the orientation of the paper?

Suggestions for titles?

Rob

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 7:24 AM Yanina Sica <yanina.sica@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear all,

Last week we had a great meeting where we discussed the advances on the HE manuscript (here). We are still working on this first draft, in particular, we are still drafting the discussion and the figures. I will start assigning some sections for you to review or write from scratch. Please let me know if you do not feel comfortable with these assignments. 

One key item that we discussed is that we would like to switch the terminology to 'surveys'. This would be the main way to refer to a sampling event. Although 'inventory' and 'sampling' will also be used along the text. Somewhere we will need to add a paragraph saying that we will use the terms interchangeably.

I do not think we need to meet today, but the link is open and feel free to use it to discuss any particular matter. Thanks, John for those great visuals on the events, I encourage you to meet and keep discussing this topic.

All the best,

Yani

_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list -- tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tdwg-humboldt-leave@lists.tdwg.org

--

Robert D Stevenson
Associate Professor

Department of Biology
UMass Boston