Hi all,
I believe the whole purpose of writing a paper about the extension is to reach the scientific community and not necessarily the data managers (we can use other channels for this community) so* let's keep scientists as our audience*! Feel free to add options for titles! I would not use GBIF in the title because GBIF is just another user of standards (a big one).
I will not be able to meet this week. I am at COP16 and my talk about standards and the Humbodt Extension went really well, we got some nice questions.
I "assigned" sections of the MS to some of you in the Google doc, do you get those notifications?
Let's keep writing this great paper together here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I7RRu6mj7u53-zz6c_8ZIYqLsNMA0o6VwP3fuSTMWcI/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.pnvd9idaqs35
Yani
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 3:19 PM Guralnick,Robert rguralnick@flmnh.ufl.edu wrote:
Kate is working on a data publishing guide for Humboldt Extension so I think the audience should surely be on "broad audience of scientists who design studies and collect data." Just my 2 quick cents (maybe it is 1 cent in this case?)
*From:* Rob Stevenson rdstevenson10@gmail.com *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2024 9:08 AM *To:* Humboldt Core TG tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org *Cc:* Wesley M. Hochachka wmh6@cornell.edu; steve.baskauf@gmail.com < steve.baskauf@gmail.com> *Subject:* [tdwg-humboldt] Re: no meeting for me - working on the MS
*[External Email]* Hi All,
Based on discussions last week and the comments left by Dmitry regarding the title and audience for this manuscript, it is hard to orient the paper until we have a consensus on the audience
I favor trying to reach a broad audience of scientists who design studies and collect data rather than the data managers who are likely to use the Humboldt core.
To that end, the paper should announces the accomplishment of the new standard
Something such as
GBIF moves beyond archiving presence-only data: Capturing the scope and effort of surveys and inventories
Thoughts about the orientation of the paper?
Suggestions for titles?
Rob
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 7:24 AM Yanina Sica yanina.sica@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
Last week we had a great meeting where we discussed the advances on the HE manuscript (here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I7RRu6mj7u53-zz6c_8ZIYqLsNMA0o6VwP3fuSTMWcI/edit?tab=t.0). We are still working on this first draft, in particular, we are still drafting the discussion and the figures. I will start assigning some sections for you to review or write from scratch. *Please let me know if you do not feel comfortable with these assignments. *
One key item that we discussed is that we would like to switch the terminology to 'surveys'. This would be the main way to refer to a sampling event. Although 'inventory' and 'sampling' will also be used along the text. Somewhere we will need to add a paragraph saying that we will use the terms interchangeably.
I do not think we need to meet today, but the *link is open and feel free to use it to discuss any particular matter.* Thanks, John for those great visuals on the events, I encourage you to meet and keep discussing this topic.
All the best,
Yani _______________________________________________ tdwg-humboldt mailing list -- tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org To unsubscribe send an email to tdwg-humboldt-leave@lists.tdwg.org
-- Robert D Stevenson Associate Professor Department of Biology UMass Boston _______________________________________________ tdwg-humboldt mailing list -- tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org To unsubscribe send an email to tdwg-humboldt-leave@lists.tdwg.org
