I like V2  very much, and I agree with Rob – imho Yani as a first “drive” author, John as a last author? Placeholder suggestions added.

DS

 

From: tdwg-humboldt <tdwg-humboldt-bounces@lists.tdwg.org> On Behalf Of Rob Stevenson
Sent: Friday, 30 June, 2023 12:50
To: Humboldt Core TG <tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org>
Subject: Re: [tdwg-humboldt] TDWG 2023 Abstract

 

Dear Yani

 

Wesley did a great job reorganizing the abstract but I believe you are the primary mover and organizer and therefore should be first author.  I suggest that John be added as a co-author. His participation and insights have helped significantly.  

 

Thanks Yani, Steve and others for steering us towards completion.

 

Rob

 

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 6:18 AM ys628 <yanina.sica@yale.edu> wrote:

Hi all, 

 

I would like to ask you to take a look at the abstract one more time. Wesley did a major rearranging (OPTION 2, some description below). I want to make sure everybody agrees...also in regarding the authors.

 

Instructions! https://www.tdwg.org/conferences/2023/instructions-for-abstract-submission/ Title: Want to describe share biodiversity inventory and monitoring data? The Humboldt Extension for Ecological Inventories can help! Please complete your name and affiliation Authors: Yi-Ming Gan1, Kate In...

 

 

I will submit later today or even tomorrow morning (July 1st) to give you more time to review

 

Thanks a lot

 

Yani

 

---mail and explanation from Wesley

 

Hi Yani and Ming,

 

   If this message looks like something that is relevant for the entire group, could you please forward it to the Humboldt Extension listserv? I'm writing to both of you because Yani you should be aware of what I've done sooner rather than later, and Ming because I saw that you were viewing the document while I was also mucking around with it.

 

   Somehow, I ended up experimenting with a major reorganization of the material in the existing abstract, while (hopefully) not deleting any information, and adding little new information (the exception being the fourth and fifth sentences).  I have pasted my experimental reoganization of the material below the current version, and I have written a long comment linked to the first word in my experiment.  Unfortunately, it's impossible to see where the original text remained, where parts of the original text were moved, or where I made additions, because I made a local copy of the original and then copied the end result back...and all of the change-tracking colour information disappeared.

 

   Anyway, as I wrote at the end of my comment, you absolutely should treat what I did as an experiment in creating a new order of presentation of the ideas in the original version, and use the new organization, or not, to the extent that you see fit.

 

 

   Oh, and regarding English versus U.S. spelling, I'm definitely the worst person to ask, because the spelling all looks Canadian (i.e. a British-U.S. hybrid) to me.

 

Wesley

 

 

 

*******************
Wesley Hochachka
Senior Research Associate
Cornell Lab of Ornithology
ph. (607) 254-2484
*******************

 

 

_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list
tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
https://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt


 

--

Robert D Stevenson
Associate Professor

Department of Biology
UMass Boston