Dear all,

In our meeting today we discussed that the time requirement for the public comment to Humboldt has now been met without any outstanding issues, but we did not have any time to review the document shared here. Independent of that document we agreed that we would keep the public review open at least until Ani has had a chance to corral her iDiv audience and discuss the extension live and in person.

We also discussed the remaining promised Task Group task of mapping additional data sets to get to the total of seven. As that was a proposed output of the Task Group, it doesn't affect the term ratification process, and is open to justification to the Executive committee if not all seven are actually delivered. If we can though, great, and the timeline for doing so only really affects the disbanding of the Task Group. Since we will wait at least two weeks for the iDiv feedback and we need to assess this document from Peggy and add issues to the issue tracker as appropriate, we are likely looking at at least another 30 days of public comments from the time that is done anyway.

So the big task for next week is to discuss the ALA report, and even before then, if possible, get any clear issue into the Humboldt Extension issue tracker (https://github.com/tdwg/hc/issues).

Cheers,

John

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 8:55 AM ys628 <yanina.sica@yale.edu> wrote:
Dear Peggy,

Thank you so much for the detailed revision and for sharing your feedback with us. 
This is very useful for us particularly because the issues you found are clearly described and justified, I really appreciate this.

We have a meeting today (which unfortunately I cannot assist) but I would ask the group to start revising your feedback. 
I uploaded the document to our shared Drive so we can start adding our comments in response to your findings.

After internally discussing your feedback, I will reach out to you and invite you to join our meetings so we can find a solution.

Thank you again and I am glad you find the Humbold a useful addition!

Best,

Yanina Sica




Yanina V. Sica, PhD
Lead Data Team
Yale University
pronouns: she/her/hers
If you are receiving this email outside of your working hours, I am not expecting you to read or respond
From: tdwg-humboldt <tdwg-humboldt-bounces@lists.tdwg.org> on behalf of Newman, Peggy (NCMI, Clayton) <Peggy.Newman@csiro.au>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 6:42:28 AM
To: tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org <tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org>
Subject: [tdwg-humboldt] ALA data team feedback
 

Greetings Team Humboldt!

 

It was sure nice to catch up with some of you over the past weeks.

 

I have a document that we’ve put together with our suggestions for the extension. Our team had two discussions about it, and Doug wrote up our conclusions in a 2 pager word doc.

 

So I’ve tried to attach them here, but don’t know how the listserv will cope with a document.  Let’s see.

 

In any case, how is best to proceed from here? Let us know if you’d like to talk in person I guess.

 

Cheers

Peggy

_______________________________________________
tdwg-humboldt mailing list
tdwg-humboldt@lists.tdwg.org
https://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-humboldt