Re: [tdwg-content] RFC 2119: Re: Public comment on the Darwin Core RDF Guide
30 Nov
2014
30 Nov
'14
06:30
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:08:36 -0500 Jonathan A Rees rees@mumble.net wrote:
Do you know of any precedent for 2119 language to be used in a vocabulary specification? I'd be very interested to see that...
http://www.w3.org/Submission/sioc-related/ http://rdfs.org/resume-rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/vocabulary https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/people/index.html http://www.openannotation.org/spec/alpha2/ http://socsem.open.ac.uk/ontologies/curio/ http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/vocab/ http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/ http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-people/ http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/ http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Guide/
-Paul
--
Paul J. Morris
Biodiversity Informatics Manager
Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy
mole@morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available
3674
Age (days ago)
3674
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Paul J. Morris