Steve wrote:
Yes, Kevin's interpretation is the same as the way I see it. But this is only a small part of what Gregor presented in his last email. I really don't understand where all the other stuff fits into this. I get the feeling Gregor has designed the entire system and is now feeding us little bits at a time (currently "special states"). When we suggest alternatives Gregor seems to respond "No, that won't work because all the rest of it will break". I find this very frustrating as we seem to be going around in circles. I don't know what the solution is, but I'm pretty sure this isn't it.
First: I do not have the solution and am feeding it! I am searching it together with you. On the other hand, I have some vague ideas what may work, and naturally these ideas influence me in the direction I am going.
I tried to be very serious in stepping back and explaining why I consider it a progress that made in the Brazil discussion: The general sorting out of how to treat categorical states, numerical statistical parameter, and coding states in a model that supports extension in future SDD versions and multiple languages. Note that text characters or states and numerical value lists are not yet touched at all.
Steve: can you be more specific about what "doesn't make much sense" to you? I often feel that my communication skills are inadequate. However, I really did not want to give the impression in the "stepping back to the generalized character definition..." posting "No, that won't work because all the rest of it will break". I truly welcome proposals that show alternative ways that are easier to grasp.
However, the problems are connected. This is not specific to SDD. For example, you cannot talk in DELTA about character dependency and ignore how characters and states are modeled. The "Special states" which I am very grateful you criticized in so much detail, is embedded in the context of the Brazil proposal. In "stepping back" I tried to summarize the relevant context and throw the discussion open whether this should be changed.
Steve, we need much more input and feedback from you and others. Tell me what do you propose to do that it is less frustrating?
Gregor ---------------------------------------------------------- Gregor Hagedorn (G.Hagedorn@bba.de) Institute for Plant Virology, Microbiology, and Biosafety Federal Research Center for Agriculture and Forestry (BBA) Koenigin-Luise-Str. 19 Tel: +49-30-8304-2220 14195 Berlin, Germany Fax: +49-30-8304-2203
Often wrong but never in doubt!
participants (1)
-
Gregor Hagedorn