use of the terms dcterms:rightsHolder and dcterms:accessRights in existing databases
The terms dcterms:rightsHolder and dcterms:accessRights are "imported" from Dublin Core into the Darwin Core record-level vocabulary. I am interested in them for two reasons: there are several issues with the use of those terms as RDF predicates, and they differ from the terms suggested for use in rights management in the draft Audubon Core vocabulary. What I am wondering is how widely are they actually used in databases by our community? If you maintain a database, do you use them?
Steve
Interesting question. Among the VertNet data publishers (85 institutions, 195 collections so far), none of them track or publish this information at the level of individual records, but rather as information at the level of the metadata for entire collections. Using Darwin Core Archives, this information would be in the EML metadata document.
The interesting part is that the collection metadata is disjunct from the primary data unless someone specifically does something to remedy the situation. No occurrence record knows what its rightsHolder and accessRights are. So, when they go into the wild mixed with records from other institutions, that information is effectively lost. It would be better if it was not lost. One way to do this in conventional publishing using Darwin Core Archives would be to generate the record-level metadata from the collection-level metadata during the publishing process. That's what we are doing in VertNet as we transition from DiGIR providers to Darwin Core Archives.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Steve Baskauf steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu wrote:
The terms dcterms:rightsHolder and dcterms:accessRights are "imported" from Dublin Core into the Darwin Core record-level vocabulary. I am interested in them for two reasons: there are several issues with the use of those terms as RDF predicates, and they differ from the terms suggested for use in rights management in the draft Audubon Core vocabulary. What I am wondering is how widely are they actually used in databases by our community? If you maintain a database, do you use them?
Steve
-- Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences
postal mail address: VU Station B 351634 Nashville, TN 37235-1634, U.S.A.
delivery address: 2125 Stevenson Center 1161 21st Ave., S. Nashville, TN 37235
office: 2128 Stevenson Center phone: (615) 343-4582, fax: (615) 343-6707 http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:18:41 -0300 John Wieczorek tuco@berkeley.edu wrote:
Interesting question. Among the VertNet data publishers (85 institutions, 195 collections so far), none of them track or publish this information at the level of individual records,
The MCZ is using dcterms:rightsHolder as a record level term in the data it is providing through IPT, as well as the related EML terms in the metadata document.
but rather as information at the level of the metadata for entire collections. Using Darwin Core Archives, this information would be in the EML metadata document.
The interesting part is that the collection metadata is disjunct from the primary data unless someone specifically does something to remedy the situation.
A requirement that the management/lawyers at ANSP imposed about a decade or so ago was that any electronic presentation of search results from the Academy's database include a terms and conditions statement. This fed into a requirement on the development of the OBIS DarwinCore schema for a terms and conditions element (which we populated with a link to the terms and conditions document on the Academy's website). Given that technology, this was the only way to ensure that any given search result contained the relevant metadata, and provided for the potential for upstream aggregators to pass the metadata along with records that had orginated from ANSP.
No occurrence record knows what its rightsHolder and accessRights are. So, when they go into the wild mixed with records from other institutions, that information is effectively lost. It would be better if it was not lost. One way to do this in conventional publishing using Darwin Core Archives would be to generate the record-level metadata from the collection-level metadata during the publishing process. That's what we are doing in VertNet as we transition from DiGIR providers to Darwin Core Archives.
That's a nice approach, as long as the EML terms map in sensible ways into the record level terms.
-Paul
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Steve Baskauf steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu wrote:
The terms dcterms:rightsHolder and dcterms:accessRights are "imported" from Dublin Core into the Darwin Core record-level vocabulary. I am interested in them for two reasons: there are several issues with the use of those terms as RDF predicates, and they differ from the terms suggested for use in rights management in the draft Audubon Core vocabulary. What I am wondering is how widely are they actually used in databases by our community? If you maintain a database, do you use them?
Steve
-- Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences
postal mail address: VU Station B 351634 Nashville, TN 37235-1634, U.S.A.
delivery address: 2125 Stevenson Center 1161 21st Ave., S. Nashville, TN 37235
office: 2128 Stevenson Center phone: (615) 343-4582, fax: (615) 343-6707 http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
We use dcterms:rightsHolder extensively at the level of individual data objects (multimedia, text) at Encyclopedia of Life.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Steve Baskauf steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu wrote:
The terms dcterms:rightsHolder and dcterms:accessRights are "imported" from Dublin Core into the Darwin Core record-level vocabulary. I am interested in them for two reasons: there are several issues with the use of those terms as RDF predicates, and they differ from the terms suggested for use in rights management in the draft Audubon Core vocabulary. What I am wondering is how widely are they actually used in databases by our community? If you maintain a database, do you use them?
Steve
-- Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences
postal mail address: VU Station B 351634 Nashville, TN 37235-1634, U.S.A.
delivery address: 2125 Stevenson Center 1161 21st Ave., S. Nashville, TN 37235
office: 2128 Stevenson Center phone: (615) 343-4582, fax: (615) 343-6707 http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
-- Paul J. Morris Biodiversity Informatics Manager Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy mole@morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available _______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
Steve,
Discover Life serves terms of use info with each record too. For example, see http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20l?id=GBIF79370852
Cheers, Pick
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Cynthia Parr wrote:
We use dcterms:rightsHolder extensively at the level of individual data objects (multimedia, text) at Encyclopedia of Life.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Steve Baskauf steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu wrote:
The terms dcterms:rightsHolder and dcterms:accessRights are "imported" from Dublin Core into the Darwin Core record-level vocabulary. I am interested in them for two reasons: there are several issues with the use of those terms as RDF predicates, and they differ from the terms suggested for use in rights management in the draft Audubon Core vocabulary. What I am wondering is how widely are they actually used in databases by our community? If you maintain a database, do you use them?
Steve
-- Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences
postal mail address: VU Station B 351634 Nashville, TN 37235-1634, U.S.A.
delivery address: 2125 Stevenson Center 1161 21st Ave., S. Nashville, TN 37235
office: 2128 Stevenson Center phone: (615) 343-4582, fax: (615) 343-6707 http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
-- Paul J. Morris Biodiversity Informatics Manager Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zo�logy mole@morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available _______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
Hi,
At Canadensys, we publish our data as Darwin Core archives and we are using rightsHolder for every record, just as VertNet is planning to do. The value for rightsHolder = institutionCode = the institution the dataset is registered with at GBIF, e.g. "Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centre"
We are not using accessRights, but we do populate "rights" for every record. It has the same value as the rights in the EML: " http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ & http://www.canadensys.net/norms"
The whole reason we are doing so is - as John points out - to keep the information if the records get aggregated with other records. For that reason we are also populating: - rightsHolder (= full institution name) - collectionID (= biocol LSID) - datasetID (= url of published dataset, e.g. on IPT) - institutionCode (= full institution name) - collectionCode (= official acronym of collection) - datasetName (= title of dataset in EML) - ownerInstitutionCode (= full institution name)
Peter
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:05 AM, John Pickering pick@discoverlife.orgwrote:
Steve,
Discover Life serves terms of use info with each record too. For example, see http://www.discoverlife.org/**mp/20l?id=GBIF79370852http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20l?id=GBIF79370852
Cheers, Pick
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Cynthia Parr wrote:
We use dcterms:rightsHolder extensively at the level of individual data
objects (multimedia, text) at Encyclopedia of Life.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Steve Baskauf
steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu wrote:
The terms dcterms:rightsHolder and dcterms:accessRights are "imported" from Dublin Core into the Darwin Core record-level vocabulary. I am interested in them for two reasons: there are several issues with the use of those terms as RDF predicates, and they differ from the terms suggested for use in rights management in the draft Audubon Core vocabulary. What I am wondering is how widely are they actually used in databases by our community? If you maintain a database, do you use them?
Steve
-- Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences
postal mail address: VU Station B 351634 Nashville, TN 37235-1634, U.S.A.
delivery address: 2125 Stevenson Center 1161 21st Ave., S. Nashville, TN 37235
office: 2128 Stevenson Center phone: (615) 343-4582, fax: (615) 343-6707 http://bioimages.vanderbilt.**edu http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu
______________________________**_________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/**listinfo/tdwg-contenthttp://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
______________________________**_________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/**listinfo/tdwg-contenthttp://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
-- Paul J. Morris Biodiversity Informatics Manager Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy mole@morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available ______________________________**_________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/**listinfo/tdwg-contenthttp://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
participants (6)
-
Cynthia Parr -
John Pickering -
John Wieczorek -
Paul J. Morris -
Peter Desmet -
Steve Baskauf