subgenus as part of higherClassification
How would you expect to find a subgenus, which in the term subgenus is combined with its genus for disambiguating homonymies, when you cite it as part of the higherClassification? Do you cite it as you do in the term for subgenus or "naked"?
Aphis (Aphis) glycines
dwc:higherClassificationAnimalia;Arthropoda;Insecta;Hemiptera;Sternorr hyncha;Aphidoidea;Aphididae;Aphis;Aphis (Aphis)</ dwc:higherClassification>
or
dwc:higherClassificationAnimalia;Arthropoda;Insecta;Hemiptera;Sternorr hyncha;Aphidoidea;Aphididae;Aphis;Aphis</dwc:higherClassification>
considering that there are about 4 other possible ranks in between the subgenus and species?
Thanks! Gail
* * * * * * * "Indecision may or may not be my problem." --- Jimmy Buffett
Gail E. Kampmeier Sr. Research Entomologist Illinois Natural History Survey Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Box 5 NSRC, MC-637 1101 W. Peabody, Urbana, IL 61801 USA ph. 217-333-2824 fax 217-244-1707 email: gkamp@illinois.edu **note change** http://www.inhs.illinois.edu/~gkamp/ * * * * * * *
Good question Gail, I am currently working on integrating million of names from several large datasets right now and it seems both ways are equally often used. Personally I much prefer to cite the subgenus in bracket together with the genus, otherwise its hard or even impossible to tell the two apart.
Markus
On Nov 3, 2009, at 22:10, Gail Kampmeier wrote:
How would you expect to find a subgenus, which in the term subgenus is combined with its genus for disambiguating homonymies, when you cite it as part of the higherClassification? Do you cite it as you do in the term for subgenus or "naked"?
Aphis (Aphis) glycines
< dwc:higherClassification
Animalia ;Arthropoda ;Insecta;Hemiptera;Sternorrhyncha;Aphidoidea;Aphididae;Aphis;Aphis (Aphis)</dwc:higherClassification>
or
< dwc:higherClassification
Animalia ;Arthropoda ;Insecta;Hemiptera;Sternorrhyncha;Aphidoidea;Aphididae;Aphis;Aphis</ dwc:higherClassification>
considering that there are about 4 other possible ranks in between the subgenus and species?
Thanks! Gail
"Indecision may or may not be my problem." --- Jimmy Buffett
Gail E. Kampmeier Sr. Research Entomologist Illinois Natural History Survey Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Box 5 NSRC, MC-637 1101 W. Peabody, Urbana, IL 61801 USA ph. 217-333-2824 fax 217-244-1707 email: gkamp@illinois.edu **note change** http://www.inhs.illinois.edu/~gkamp/
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
Markus,
If you prefer "genus (subgenus)" - which I guess is following the ICZN - would you then also prefer "genus rank infragenericName" (Amaranthus subgenus Albersia, Carex section Phacocystis), which is the correct way to write it according to the ICBN?
The updated version Vascan will use this formula for its scientificName (we don't have higherClassification or subgenus), will this cause any problems?
Peter
2009/11/4 "Markus Döring (GBIF)" mdoering@gbif.org:
Good question Gail, I am currently working on integrating million of names from several large datasets right now and it seems both ways are equally often used. Personally I much prefer to cite the subgenus in bracket together with the genus, otherwise its hard or even impossible to tell the two apart.
Markus
On Nov 3, 2009, at 22:10, Gail Kampmeier wrote:
How would you expect to find a subgenus, which in the term subgenus is combined with its genus for disambiguating homonymies, when you cite it as part of the higherClassification? Do you cite it as you do in the term for subgenus or "naked"?
Aphis (Aphis) glycines
< dwc:higherClassification
Animalia ;Arthropoda ;Insecta;Hemiptera;Sternorrhyncha;Aphidoidea;Aphididae;Aphis;Aphis (Aphis)</dwc:higherClassification>
or
< dwc:higherClassification
Animalia ;Arthropoda ;Insecta;Hemiptera;Sternorrhyncha;Aphidoidea;Aphididae;Aphis;Aphis</ dwc:higherClassification>
considering that there are about 4 other possible ranks in between the subgenus and species?
Thanks! Gail
"Indecision may or may not be my problem." --- Jimmy Buffett
Gail E. Kampmeier Sr. Research Entomologist Illinois Natural History Survey Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Box 5 NSRC, MC-637 1101 W. Peabody, Urbana, IL 61801 USA ph. 217-333-2824 fax 217-244-1707 email: gkamp@illinois.edu **note change** http://www.inhs.illinois.edu/~gkamp/
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
Peter, I would actually prefer that, yes. But as long as you can indicate the rank separately, it can be interpreted correctly without the corresponding genus. Just in the higherClassification you cant always, as its a concatenation of names only.
Markus
On Nov 8, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Peter Desmet wrote:
Markus,
If you prefer "genus (subgenus)" - which I guess is following the ICZN
- would you then also prefer "genus rank infragenericName" (Amaranthus
subgenus Albersia, Carex section Phacocystis), which is the correct way to write it according to the ICBN?
The updated version Vascan will use this formula for its scientificName (we don't have higherClassification or subgenus), will this cause any problems?
Peter
2009/11/4 "Markus Döring (GBIF)" mdoering@gbif.org:
Good question Gail, I am currently working on integrating million of names from several large datasets right now and it seems both ways are equally often used. Personally I much prefer to cite the subgenus in bracket together with the genus, otherwise its hard or even impossible to tell the two apart.
Markus
On Nov 3, 2009, at 22:10, Gail Kampmeier wrote:
How would you expect to find a subgenus, which in the term subgenus is combined with its genus for disambiguating homonymies, when you cite it as part of the higherClassification? Do you cite it as you do in the term for subgenus or "naked"?
Aphis (Aphis) glycines
< dwc:higherClassification
Animalia ;Arthropoda ;Insecta;Hemiptera;Sternorrhyncha;Aphidoidea;Aphididae;Aphis;Aphis (Aphis)</dwc:higherClassification>
or
< dwc:higherClassification
Animalia ;Arthropoda ;Insecta;Hemiptera;Sternorrhyncha;Aphidoidea;Aphididae;Aphis;Aphis</ dwc:higherClassification>
considering that there are about 4 other possible ranks in between the subgenus and species?
Thanks! Gail
"Indecision may or may not be my problem." --- Jimmy Buffett
Gail E. Kampmeier Sr. Research Entomologist Illinois Natural History Survey Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Box 5 NSRC, MC-637 1101 W. Peabody, Urbana, IL 61801 USA ph. 217-333-2824 fax 217-244-1707 email: gkamp@illinois.edu **note change** http://www.inhs.illinois.edu/~gkamp/
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
-- Peter Desmet Biodiversity Informatics Manager / Directeur de l'informatique de la biodiversité Montréal Biodiversity Centre / Centre sur la biodiversité Canadensys - www.canadensys.net
Institut de recherche en biologie végétale Université de Montréal 4101 Rue Sherbrooke Est Montréal, Québec, H1X2B2 Canada
Télé / Phone: 514-872-5249 Télécopie / Fax: 514-872-9406 Email: peter.desmet@umontreal.ca / peter.desmet.cubc@gmail.com Public profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterdesmet _______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
participants (3)
-
"Markus Döring (GBIF)" -
Gail Kampmeier -
Peter Desmet