Looks like this one is off to a good start. If there is no dissenting opinion in the next 30 days, it looks like it'll be included.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devries@gmail.com wrote:
I have something similar that I use for stating the year the species was described. This is useful for sorting by year etc. So +1 Note the datatype rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYear"
From http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p.html%C2%A0RDF%C2%A0http://10.10.10.122... txn:yearDescribed rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYear"1771</txn:yearDescribed>
Ontology <!-- http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/txn.owl#yearDescribed --> owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:about="http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/txn.owl#yearDescribed" rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYear"yearDescribed</rdfs:label> rdfs:commentThe year that the species was originally described</rdfs:comment> rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/txn.owl"/ <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYear%22/%3E </owl:DatatypeProperty>
- Pete
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:35 PM, John Wieczorek tuco@berkeley.edu wrote:
Darwin Core Issue 84: http://goo.gl/8WkJa
This issue has not undergone public commentary.
Open Issues: Determine if there is a demand for this term. Though the term is well-described in the issue tracker, there is no evidence of a real-world need for it. There has to be a demonstrated need from more than one "independent" source for a term to enter into consideration for addition to the Darwin Core. _______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
--
Pete DeVries Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin - Madison 445 Russell Laboratories 1630 Linden Drive Madison, WI 53706 Email: pdevries@wisc.edu TaxonConcept & GeoSpecies Knowledge Bases A Semantic Web, Linked Open Data Project