Re: [Tdwg-lit] Level 1

Hi Rich,

...

I meant ISO dates only for "date published (as corrected)". I agree with you date issue; in Level 1, date published as cited should be as is, shouldn't be interpreted.

But wouldn't we also want the "corrected" (="interpreted") date (or date range) to be among the attributes -- even at level 1? If for no other reason than estimating chronology?

I do not understand here. Anne's start point documents contains both date published, as cited and as corrected. The latter comes with dd/mm/yyyy as an example. I suggested to use ISO date format for this one, not "as cited" one.

Cheers, JMS