Gregor,

Should we consider a TCS version 2 with this capability?

greg

On 25 November 2010 23:54, Gregor Hagedorn <g.m.hagedorn@gmail.com> wrote:
About the problem of being unable to use fragments: SDD provides two
root schemata, one that allows only valid "complete" datasets, another
allowing fragments. ("object interchange..."). Under the assumptions
of xml-schema, it is perfectly legal to have schema-validation
variants for differnt purposes.

It was originally planned to merge the xml-standards (TCS, SDD, ABCD)
into one unified one, thus introducing such mechanisms (and extension
mechanisms like in SDD) into all. This was stopped by the TDWG
executive in favor of redesigning everything as RDF vocabularies
instead of xml-schema.  So the xml-schema standards are somewhat poor
orphans... :-)

Gregor
_______________________________________________
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content


If you have received this transmission in error please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. If this e-mail or any attachments have been sent to you in error, that error does not constitute waiver of any confidentiality, privilege or copyright in respect of information in the e-mail or attachments.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.



--
Greg Whitbread
Australian National Botanic Gardens
Australian National Herbarium
+61 2 62509482
ghw@anbg.gov.au