Dear Éamonn, all,
I am currently using a dataset with density and biomass data, and was wondering within what timeframe the terms organismQuantity and organismQuantityType would be adopted and whether these terms are already recognised in the IPT2.2 pre-release version.
If this is not the case, I would appreciate your advise on the best practice to include such data at the moment. I was either thinking to (mis)use the inidividualCount field or use the MeasurementOrFact extension. What would you recommend?
Thanks for your advise!
With best regards, Aaike
Éamonn Ó Tuama [GBIF] wrote:
Based on the feedback to make the labels more explicit and also remove examples from the definitions, here are the revised labels and definitions for what were originally "quantity" (now "organismQuantity") and "quantityType" (now "organismQuantityType"):
organismQuantity
#Definition A number or enumeration value for the quantity of organisms. Use with organismQuantityType to indicate the type of entity that is being quantified.
#Comment The terms organismQuantity and organismQuantityType are required to be used as a pair. The value of organismQuantity is a number or enumeration, e.g., “27” for an organismQuantityType “individuals”, “12.5” for an organismQuantityType “%biomass”, or “r” for an organismQuantityType “BraunBlanquetScale”.
organismQuantityType
#Definition The type of entity to which the number or enumeration value reported for the quantity of organisms in organismQuantity refers.
#Comment The terms organismQuantity and organismQuantityType are required to be used as a pair. The value of organismQuantityType (i.e., the entity being measured) is expected to be drawn from a small controlled vocabulary with terms such as “Individuals”, “%Biomass”, “%Biovolume”, “%Species”, “%Coverage”, “BraunBlanquetScale”, “DominScale”. Examples when combined with organismQuantity values: + on DominScale; 5 on BraunBlanquetScale; 45 for %Biomass.