On 20/11/2010, at 5:32 AM, Steve Baskauf wrote:
The other question is a more general one. Do we need more ways to specify uncertainty in location than we already have? We already have
Another thing: our data distinguishes between "X is known to occur in Australia" and "X is ubiquitous throughout Australia" (eg: rabbits). I believe the first often crops up in historical data when some document states that X was seen in Novo Hollandiae, and we don't know anything more than that.
If you have received this transmission in error please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. If this e-mail or any attachments have been sent to you in error, that error does not constitute waiver of any confidentiality, privilege or copyright in respect of information in the e-mail or attachments.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.