4 Jul
2011
4 Jul
'11
23:59
Thanks Greg! Can I second that heartily? It is VERY important to have yearofpublication for reasons that may not be apparent now, but will be as soon as the PhyloCode hits the shelves (next year). So thanks for including that.
nico
On Jul 4, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
I second this request. In the absence of a widely accepted nomenclatural standard, DwC is and should be used for basic exchange of nomenclatural information. I consider yearOfPublication important in this respect.
Gregor _______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content