I agree.

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Steve Baskauf <steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
I was examining the definition of dwc:organismScope
(http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/organismScope ) and noticed that its
comment specifically says "To describe the kind of Organism using a URI
object in RDF, use rdf:type ... instead."  The Darwin Core RDF Guide
includes dwc:organismScope in the category of terms having analogues in
the dwciri: namespace (i.e. having an IRI-reference object).  I believe
that it should be removed from that list and placed in Table 3.8 [1]
with an explanation that rdf:type should be used instead in accordance
with the term comment.

Steve Baskauf

[1]
https://code.google.com/p/tdwg-rdf/wiki/DwcRdfGuideProposalRevised#3.8_Darwin_Core_terms_for_which_this_guide_does_not_recommend_th

--
Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer
Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences

postal mail address:
PMB 351634
Nashville, TN  37235-1634,  U.S.A.

delivery address:
2125 Stevenson Center
1161 21st Ave., S.
Nashville, TN 37235

office: 2128 Stevenson Center
phone: (615) 343-4582,  fax: (615) 322-4942
If you fax, please phone or email so that I will know to look for it.
http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu
http://vanderbilt.edu/trees


_______________________________________________
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content