Hi Roderic,
Thanks for your reply.
But I've almost the same feeling. The more I read about LSIDs, the more I feel that there are no real huge benefits over URLs, .. although it looks like different concept to me: I see more an URL as the location of the resource, and the LSID the identifier of that resource.
It's frustrating because at first glances all the models and the "to be compliant you must ..." rules that come with the spec seemed pretty
Some advantages I see compared to URLs: - the separation of data and metadata (through the .getData / .getMetadata methods and the WSDL files), .. although you could achieve more or less the same by playing on the Accept header of the HTTP request - the versioning - the resolution services/discovery services.. although there are a lot of "assuming that..." in the spec - protocol independent - other things ... ?
Best regards, Julien
On 06/18/2012 15:15, Roderic Page wrote:
Hi Julien,
Firstly, let me say "run, run away now". Unless you need to support resolving existing LSIDs (e.g., Index Fungorum, IPNI) then I can see no reason to use LSIDs. The future landscape of identifiers is essentially URLs and DOIs. The difference between the two boils down to whether you want your identifiers to have a degree of management or not (you can add management to URLs but the DOI infrastructure for this seems more established).
My understanding has been that querying the DNS for the SRV record is enough. This is what my LSID tester http://darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/~rpage/lsid/tester/ http://darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/%7Erpage/lsid/tester/ does. Reading the LSID spec I get the sense that, had it been more widely adopted, there was a mechanism to resolve LSID authorities centrally at a server "lsidauthority.org http://lsidauthority.org" (option [a]). If this mechanism didn't exist, we would do a regular DNS lookup of the domain in the LSID we were trying to resolve (option [b]). Option (a) was never implemented, so it's option (b).
That said,
Regards
Rod
On 18 Jun 2012, at 13:04, Julien Cigar wrote:
Hello,
I'm reading the LSID spec and there are some things that are some things that are a little cloudy to me.
The spec says that the client should query the DNS for NAPTR records for the domain name "lsid.urn.arpa", but it seems that the URN NID part "lsid" has not been established at IANA (lsid.urn.arpa is unresolvable) ? Why ? I wondered if it's enough to query the DNS of the "authority identification" part of the LSID (domain name) for a _lsid._tcp SRV record and assume that this entry is a valid resolution service for the given LSID ? If not, what's the proper way to find a resolution service for, let's say, "urn:lsid:blah.my.domain:foo:12345" ?
Thank you
Best regards, Julien
-- No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
<jcigar.vcf>_______________________________________________ tdwg-content mailing list tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org mailto:tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
Roderic Page Professor of Taxonomy Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Graham Kerr Building University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Email: r.page@bio.gla.ac.uk mailto:r.page@bio.gla.ac.uk Tel: +44 141 330 4778 Fax: +44 141 330 2792 Skype: rdmpage AIM: rodpage1962@aim.com mailto:rodpage1962@aim.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1112517192 Twitter: http://twitter.com/rdmpage Blog: http://iphylo.blogspot.com Home page: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html