Re: [tdwg-content] RFC 2119: Re: Public comment on the Darwin Core RDF Guide

On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:08:36 -0500 Jonathan A Rees rees@mumble.net wrote:

Do you know of any precedent for 2119 language to be used in a vocabulary specification? I'd be very interested to see that...

http://www.w3.org/Submission/sioc-related/ http://rdfs.org/resume-rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/vocabulary https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/people/index.html http://www.openannotation.org/spec/alpha2/ http://socsem.open.ac.uk/ontologies/curio/ http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/vocab/ http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/ http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-people/ http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/ http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Guide/

-Paul