Hallo all,
we havent finally decided yet I believe. Or have we?
As the latest schema involved changes to the properties themselves, preferably I would like to see these determined ASAP. The terms can be added later, that's no problem.
if you use the ISO codes that is kind of language independant I would say. And wouldnt it be enough to use ISO 639-1 only? do we really need dialects, british vs american english etc?
For languages possibly that would be the case, although probably not everybody would associate e.g. 'deu' with German ;) But even if we stick to 'just' 185 languages, it is impossible to translate the terminology Excel document to all those languages...
And if I may add another question: how should I interpret the TaxonCoverageStrength, CommonNameCoverageStrength, etc properties exactly? In the schema as displayed by Oxygen they seem completely synonymous with TaxonCoverage, CommonNameCoverage, etc.
Regards,
Ruud