26 Jan
2017
26 Jan
'17
03:23
Dear all,
Thank you very much for your replies!
@Quetin, thanks for suggesting that organismQuantity tag - we are probably using it.
@Peter, yes, we will go with that habitat tag to describe the environment finally. I thank you a lot for the links and all the resources you mentioned.
Best,
--
Dr. Antonio Rojas Castro
Researcher, Cologne Center for eHumanities
Communication coordinator, EADH
http://www.antoniorojascastro.com
El 23 de enero de 2017 a las 16:24:53, Quentin Groom (
quentin.groom@plantentuinmeise.be) escribió:
For abundance you could use organismQuantity in conjunction with
organismQuantityType. Both are loosely defined, so just define the terms of
your abundance scale in organismQuantityType and use the relevant term in
organismQuantity. If you can restrict your terms to a more standard
terminology such as DAFOR or BraunBlanquet, so much the better.
Regards
Quentin
Dr. Quentin Groom
(Botany and Information Technology)
Botanic Garden Meise
Domein van Bouchout
B-1860 Meise
Belgium
ORCID: 0000-0002-0596-5376 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-5376
Landline; +32 (0) 226 009 20 ext. 364
FAX: +32 (0) 226 009 45
E-mail: quentin.groom@plantentuinmeise.be
Skype name: qgroom
Website: www.botanicgarden.be
On 23 January 2017 at 15:31, Peter Desmet peter.desmet.work@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Just realized that PlinianCore might also be of help:
> https://github.com/tdwg/PlinianCore/wiki It's a standard for species
> information, that I don't know much about, but there are probably
> other people on this list that do.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> On 23 January 2017 at 11:53, Peter Desmet peter.desmet.work@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Hi Antonio,
> >
> > Cool that you're trying to express this in Darwin Core!
> >
> > 1. There is no description element in DwC, but GBIF has developed a
> > description extension that may be of use. The description is free
> > text, but you can indicate its type:
> > http://rs.gbif.org/extension/gbif/1.0/description.xml. Since this is
> > an extension, you can have multiple descriptions relating back to a
> > single species. For more info on how to express these type of
> > information, this document is probably a good start:
> > http://www.gbif.org/resource/80725
> >
> > 2. DwC has a habitat element:
> > http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#habitat. It does not suggest
> > any controlled vocabularies
> >
> > 3. I'm not aware of an abundance term
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On 9 January 2017 at 17:46, Antonio Rojas Castro
> > rojas.castro.antonio@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> I am new to the Darwin Core World, so I apologize in advance if I am
> missing
> >> any basics.
> >>
> >> I am working on a project that aims to describe plants according to
> Haller.
> >> We are using DwC to encode information with XML; however, I am missing
> the
> >> following elements:
> >>
> >> an element to store small descriptions of plants;
> >>
> >> an element to store the place where plants may be found — by that I am
> not
> >> meaning the actual location where the plant was identified but its
> habitat
> >> in general terms.
> >>
> >> an element to store the frequency of the plant, in other words, if it is
> >> common or not.
> >>
> >> I am currently using my own terms to store this information:
> >>
> >> hllr:addition
> >> hllr:descriptionfoliis subhirsutis, ovato lanceolatis,
> >> acute serratis, peiolis
> >> florigeris ramosis, folia superantibus.</hllr:
> description>
> >> hllr:keywordWegränder</hllr:keyword>
> >> hllr:keywordGebüsch</hllr:keyword>
> >> hllr:keywordfelsig</hllr:keyword>
> >> hllr:frequencyverbreitet</hllr:frequency>
> >> </hllr:addition>
> >>
> >> I am wondering whether I could store that information in DwC tags
> instead —
> >> or should I be using Dublin Core tags to describe this kind of
> information?
> >>
> >> Many thanks.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dr. Antonio Rojas Castro
> >> Research assistant, Cologne Center for eHumanities
> >> Communication coordinator, EADH
> >> http://www.antoniorojascastro.com
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tdwg-content mailing list
> >> tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
> >> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>