>From now on I think we should adopt the correct usage as Bob suggests.

Use "dereferenced" when that is what we mean.

As a list, we are already pedantic about taxonomic terms and Codes.

- Pete

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote:
Is it too pedantic to wish that people would not use "resolve" when
they mean "dereference"? The terms are distinguished in RFC 3986[1]:
  "URI "resolution" is the process of
  determining an access mechanism and the appropriate parameters
  necessary to dereference a URI; this resolution may require several
  iterations.  To use that access mechanism to perform an action on the
  URI's resource is to "dereference" the URI." [1]

I bet the concensus answer to my question is "Yes".  Sigh.

[1]http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt

Bob (The Pedant) Morris

--
Robert A. Morris
Emeritus Professor  of Computer Science
UMASS-Boston
100 Morrissey Blvd
Boston, MA 02125-3390
Associate, Harvard University Herbaria
email: morris.bob@gmail.com
web: http://bdei.cs.umb.edu/
web: http://etaxonomy.org/mw/FilteredPush
http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
phone (+1) 857 222 7992 (mobile)
_______________________________________________
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content



--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pete DeVries
Department of Entomology
University of Wisconsin - Madison
445 Russell Laboratories
1630 Linden Drive
Madison, WI 53706
TaxonConcept Knowledge Base / GeoSpecies Knowledge Base
About the GeoSpecies Knowledge Base
------------------------------------------------------------