On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Steve Baskauf
<steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
The other thing I'm wondering about the values of dwc:biome would be how a
user would indicate the controlled vocabulary one is using. The ENVO
ontology is mentioned. Under the scenario of the draft RDF guide, the term
dwcuri:biome would have a URI value of
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000195>. That would be unambiguous.
However, if dwc:biome is reserved for literal values (as the RDF guide
suggests it should be) then how does a machine know that "flooded grassland
biome" is a label from ENVO and not a literal description of a biome from
the Whittaker, Walter, Bailey, etc. systems which are probably currently in
much wider use than ENVO and therefore likely controlled vocabularies of
choice for many users?
A machine will have no way to know from which vocabulary a value for a
property comes unless the value says so. That is common to all terms
that recommend a controlled vocabulary, but do not enforce it. It
would be no different for dwc:biome. The only way to be unambiguous is
to provide an unambiguous value, which, as you noted,
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000195 is.
.