Each sheet in the file is a different extension, that includes a verncular extension. The one I wished to direct you to is the one entitled Distribution. The taxon concept ID is implied as the extension is conceptually tied to the core taxon class via taxonID.

the term gbif:occurrenceStatus corresponds to your biostatus occurrence and is tied to a vocabulary for this term at

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tVs-UWMXnkD3slwIE8T336w&output=html

under the sheet entitled OccurrenceStatus

the term gbif:nativeness corresponds to your biostatus origin and is tied to a vocabulary entitled Nativeness.

source, locality, and other elements are included. This stuff is in draft for us but it seems fairly congruent.

David

On Sep 10, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Kevin Richards wrote:

This draft you mention looks like it is for vernacular names, and other stuff, but not biostatus in particular. But the same propeties could be applied to biostatus, ie

- taxon concept id

- biostatus origin (indigenous, exotic, etc)

- biostatus occurrence (absent, present, etc)

- date / temporal

- publication / source

- locality / locationId / code / geospatial parameters

hopefully mostly using Dublin Core properties, ISO codes and other standards.

Kevin

From: David Remsen (GBIF) [dremsen@gbif.org]
Sent: Thursday, 10 September 2009 5:48 p.m.
To: Blum, Stan
Cc: David Remsen (GBIF); Kevin Richards; tuco@berkeley.edu; tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
Subject: Re: [tdwg-content] biostatus

We have a draft Distribution extension that Markus initiated that represents our thoughts in this area.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=r4I1G8E7mDIgY_kt9Rxyc8A&output=html

DR

On Sep 10, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Blum, Stan wrote:

OK, I think we're in agreement that taxon (concept) attributes could include some kind of summary or assertion about whether its presence in some area is native or otherwise. As Rich says, that may need further thought to be included in DwC in this round. I think there is a strong rationale for having the ability to say the native range of taxon X is footprint Y. Any organism occurrence outside that would characterized (as native, invasive, etc.) by comparison against that footprint. That means...

The data concept that would best be applied to organism occurrence would be "wasCultivatedOrCaptive" and therefore not representative of viability at the place at that time. Whether a non-cultivated/captive occurrence is native, invasive, naturalized, or ?? remains a comparison to the (a) distribution of the taxon.

-Stan

________________________________________
From: Kevin Richards [RichardsK@landcareresearch.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:01 PM
To: Blum, Stan; tuco@berkeley.edu
Cc: tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
Subject: RE: [tdwg-content] biostatus

<snip>

I do believe biostatus applies to Taxon Concepts, not specimens (if that was what you were implying Stan), as you cannot really say that the specimen itself is invasive - it is the concept you have identified it to that can be deemed invasive, surely.
_______________________________________________
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content

Please consider the environment before printing this email
Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails.
The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz