Re: Name for the standard

RE: Name for the standard----- Original Message ----- From: Chuck.Miller@MOBOT.ORG To: TDWG-SDD@LISTSERV.NHM.KU.EDU Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 4:01 AM Subject: Re: Name for the standard

As an aside, won't all three of these languages need to fit together or follow some consistent conventions to ultimately to feed data into a complete GBIF data repository or global search service? For instance, don't they all include taxon name data?

Yes, at the moment we're not worrying too much about that, but obviously when we include a taxon name, place name, authority, reference etc these will all need to be harmonised with existing standards.