Oh, I get confused about which messages are coming from tdwg-content and which are coming from the RDF task group list. Since this message went out on the tdwg-content list, I should clarify that the document Joel cited below is a draft of the Darwin Core RDF Guide that is under review by the RDF Task Group until the end of June. If it can be edited into a form that the Task Group can recommend, it will advance to an official public review in accordance with the Darwin Core namespace policy. At that point, the modified draft will be announced to the tdwg-content list (this list) for an official comment period. It's not a problem if people want to look at the document as it stands now, but they should realize that it is a draft under review and not (yet) a submission for public comment.
Steve
joel sachs wrote:
In fact, I've been meaning to ask you something ... The DwC RDF guide (correctly, IMO) specifies that occurrences should be rdf:typed using the dwctype:Occurrence class [1]. But Darwin-SW uses the dwc:Occurrence class as the rdf:type of occurrence records. I also
...
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OLyVFuveGX1a0Yt6Niok9FfGxkrghii-xlGYhwO8...
Section 2.3.1.5