1 Nov
2009
1 Nov
'09
08:58
In my last post, I wrote:
That is, if a single TaxonNameUsage instance both carries a NomenclaturalAct and represents a TaxonomicAct, then the basisOfRecord could distinguish which of the two "things" that the specific record is intended to represent.
That sentence should have ended with: "...that the specific *instance* of the record is intended to represent."
Aloha, Rich