I second Rod’s “V. cool!” proclamation!  I think this has the potential to solve a lot of problems with DOIs (particularly for the old literature).  It doesn’t solve all the problems (e.g., we still need to define the article-level units within BHL content, and we’ll still need to establish a system of GUIDs that can be applied to sub-article units, such as treatments), but in the vast majority of cases, the DOIs will be the ticket into the services of CrossRef.

 

I desperately want to comment on several points made in this thread (which I’ve only read just now), but I’m currently travelling, so I’ll chime in later.

 

Aloha,

Rich

 

P.S. Question for Rod/Chris/anyone else concerning DOIs:  Does the annual fee only apply to the ability to mint DOIs within a given year, or does it also apply to resolving them?  Put another way, if BHL stops paying its annual fee sometime in the future, will the already-minted DOI’s be resolvable into perpetuity, or will they stop being resolved at that point?

 

 

From: tdwg-content-bounces@lists.tdwg.org [mailto:tdwg-content-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] On Behalf Of Roderic Page
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:42 AM
To: Chris Freeland
Cc: tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org; Paul Murray
Subject: Re: [tdwg-content] GUIDs for publications (usages and names)

 

 

On 5 Jan 2011, at 15:25, Chris Freeland wrote:



And following on re: DOIs, BHL has become a member of CrossRef and starting in February will begin assigning DOIs first to our monographs & then on to journal content.  There is an annual fee for membership and then a fee for every DOI assigned.  BHL is absorbing these costs for community benefit.

Chris

V. cool! 

 

Regards

 

Rod

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------

Roderic Page

Professor of Taxonomy

Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine

College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences

Graham Kerr Building

University of Glasgow

Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

 

Tel: +44 141 330 4778

Fax: +44 141 330 2792