Those definitions in the DwC documetation are correct. Note that they are not implementation-specific. The caution here is that an ISO 8601 date time is much more expressive than an xs:datetime (a specific implementation), for example.
I was going by the definitions at http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#eventDate and http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#eventTime
Going by these definitions, eventDate is an ISO 8601 encoded thing that can include both date and time (or only date at a lower resolution). eventTime appears to only refer to the time (at least based on the examples). If we are going to call these things dwc:eventDate and dwc:eventTime we have to go with the way they are defined in the Darwin Core standard.
Steve
Mark Wilden wrote:On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Richard Pyle <deepreef@bishopmuseum.org> wrote:Yeah, I originally had it as eventDate, but then switched to eventTime. If Date can include time (and Time is assumed not to include date), then using eventDate is fine.I would recommend using eventTime for a date + time-of-day. "Time" is more general than "date." This is the usage in the Ruby world. ///ark Web Applications Developer Center for Applied Biodiversity Informatics California Academy of Sciences
-- Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences postal mail address: VU Station B 351634 Nashville, TN 37235-1634, U.S.A. delivery address: 2125 Stevenson Center 1161 21st Ave., S. Nashville, TN 37235 office: 2128 Stevenson Center phone: (615) 343-4582, fax: (615) 343-6707 http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu
_______________________________________________
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content