Those definitions in the DwC documetation are correct. Note that they are not implementation-specific. The caution here is that an ISO 8601 date time is much more expressive than an xs:datetime (a specific implementation), for example.

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Steve Baskauf <steve.baskauf@vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
I was going by the definitions at http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#eventDate and http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#eventTime
Going by these definitions, eventDate is an ISO 8601 encoded thing that can include both date and time (or only date at a lower resolution).  eventTime appears to only refer to the time (at least based on the examples).  If we are going to call these things dwc:eventDate and dwc:eventTime we have to go with the way they are defined in the Darwin Core standard.
Steve


Mark Wilden wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Richard Pyle
<deepreef@bishopmuseum.org> wrote:
  
Yeah, I originally had it as eventDate, but then switched to eventTime.  If
Date can include time (and Time is assumed not to include date), then using
eventDate is fine.
    
I would recommend using eventTime for a date + time-of-day. "Time" is
more general than "date." This is the usage in the Ruby world.

///ark
Web Applications Developer
Center for Applied Biodiversity Informatics
California Academy of Sciences

  

-- 
Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer
Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences

postal mail address:
VU Station B 351634
Nashville, TN  37235-1634,  U.S.A.

delivery address:
2125 Stevenson Center
1161 21st Ave., S.
Nashville, TN 37235

office: 2128 Stevenson Center
phone: (615) 343-4582,  fax: (615) 343-6707
http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu

_______________________________________________
tdwg-content mailing list
tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content