Hi all,
We discussed the outstanding DwC-A extension questions with Pier and have a proposed way forward. The motivation here is to keep the scope of the TG well-defined, and to progress exploratory activities that complement the work here.
1. Create a MIxS specific DwC-A Extension - Within the TDWG github - Containing only the fields of MIxS not covered by DwC - We will maintain a SSSOM mapping for the "covered" terms - This extension will be the reference showcasing the use of DwC and MIxS within a DwC-A for the report - Expected that TDWG / GSC will commit to maintain this with future changes in standards 2. GBIF create an additional DNA extension - In the GBIF schema repository (rs.gbif.org) - based on the MIxS Extension, but bringing in the additional terms necessary to satisfy the exchange needs of the GBIF/OBIS network - Documented in the description that it extends the MIxS one with a link - GBIF/OBIS progress with early adopters in data exchange, to be referred to in the report as a “case study” / example of use 3. Consider documenting other formats in the report - Ideas include the Frictionless Data, W3C CSV approach including a conversion to RDF
Please say if you have any comments or concerns, otherwise we’ll work through this in the coming weeks.
Many thanks, Tim
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the update. I would be interested to hear how to implement the enviro-packages in DwC. Maybe we can talk about it in the next IG meeting.
On the GBIF vocabulary page I can only find an extension that lists the package names, but it is unclear to me how to actually use the individual package terms. My first guess would be to create individual extensions for each enviro package.
Best, Gabi
Von: dwc-mixs [mailto:dwc-mixs-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] Im Auftrag von Tim Robertson Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Mai 2021 13:03 An: dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: [dwc-mixs] DwC-A Extension roadmap
Hi all,
We discussed the outstanding DwC-A extension questions with Pier and have a proposed way forward. The motivation here is to keep the scope of the TG well-defined, and to progress exploratory activities that complement the work here.
1. Create a MIxS specific DwC-A Extension - Within the TDWG github - Containing only the fields of MIxS not covered by DwC - We will maintain a SSSOM mapping for the "covered" terms - This extension will be the reference showcasing the use of DwC and MIxS within a DwC-A for the report - Expected that TDWG / GSC will commit to maintain this with future changes in standards
2. GBIF create an additional DNA extension - In the GBIF schema repository (rs.gbif.org) - based on the MIxS Extension, but bringing in the additional terms necessary to satisfy the exchange needs of the GBIF/OBIS network - Documented in the description that it extends the MIxS one with a link - GBIF/OBIS progress with early adopters in data exchange, to be referred to in the report as a “case study” / example of use
3. Consider documenting other formats in the report - Ideas include the Frictionless Data, W3C CSV approach including a conversion to RDF
Please say if you have any comments or concerns, otherwise we’ll work through this in the coming weeks.
Many thanks, Tim
Thank you for the update, Tim. Sorry I am not able to make these TG calls.
If GBIF needs new terms, would you consider submitting them for inclusion in MIxS? I know we are slow in making new releases, but we could get them in eventually, and with our new method, we should be able to release new terms without doing a full (annual) MIxS release.
Ramona ------------------------------------------------------ Ramona L. Walls, Ph.D. Senior Scientific Analyst, CyVerse Assistant Research Professor, Bio5 Institute University of Arizona rwalls@cyverse.org Office: 329 Biosciences Research Laboratory Mail: 1657 East Helen St., Tucson, AZ 85721 Telephone: 520-626-1489 Fax: 520-626-4824
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 8:10 AM Dröge, Gabriele G.Droege@bgbm.org wrote:
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the update. I would be interested to hear how to implement the enviro-packages in DwC. Maybe we can talk about it in the next IG meeting.
On the GBIF vocabulary page I can only find an extension that lists the package names, but it is unclear to me how to actually use the individual package terms. My first guess would be to create individual extensions for each enviro package.
Best,
Gabi
*Von:* dwc-mixs [mailto:dwc-mixs-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] *Im Auftrag von *Tim Robertson *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 11. Mai 2021 13:03 *An:* dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org *Betreff:* [dwc-mixs] DwC-A Extension roadmap
Hi all,
We discussed the outstanding DwC-A extension questions with Pier and have a proposed way forward.
The motivation here is to keep the scope of the TG well-defined, and to progress exploratory activities that complement the work here.
- Create a MIxS specific DwC-A Extension
Within the TDWG github
Containing only the fields of MIxS not covered by DwC
We will maintain a SSSOM mapping for the "covered" terms
This extension will be the reference showcasing the use of DwC and MIxS
within a DwC-A for the report
- Expected that TDWG / GSC will commit to maintain this with future
changes in standards
- GBIF create an additional DNA extension
In the GBIF schema repository (rs.gbif.org)
based on the MIxS Extension, but bringing in the additional terms
necessary to satisfy the exchange needs of the GBIF/OBIS network
Documented in the description that it extends the MIxS one with a link
GBIF/OBIS progress with early adopters in data exchange, to be referred
to in the report as a “case study” / example of use
- Consider documenting other formats in the report
- Ideas include the Frictionless Data, W3C CSV approach including a
conversion to RDF
Please say if you have any comments or concerns, otherwise we’ll work through this in the coming weeks.
Many thanks,
Tim _______________________________________________ dwc-mixs mailing list dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/dwc-mixs
Thanks Ramona
Yes, we will. Is https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/issues the best place please?
Thanks, Tim
From: "Ramona L. Walls" rwalls@cyverse.org Date: Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 17.18 To: "Dröge, Gabriele" G.Droege@bgbm.org Cc: Tim Robertson trobertson@gbif.org, "dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org" dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org Subject: Re: [dwc-mixs] DwC-A Extension roadmap
Thank you for the update, Tim. Sorry I am not able to make these TG calls.
If GBIF needs new terms, would you consider submitting them for inclusion in MIxS? I know we are slow in making new releases, but we could get them in eventually, and with our new method, we should be able to release new terms without doing a full (annual) MIxS release.
Ramona ------------------------------------------------------ Ramona L. Walls, Ph.D. Senior Scientific Analyst, CyVerse Assistant Research Professor, Bio5 Institute University of Arizona rwalls@cyverse.orgmailto:rwalls@cyverse.org Office: 329 Biosciences Research Laboratory Mail: 1657 East Helen St., Tucson, AZ 85721 Telephone: 520-626-1489 Fax: 520-626-4824
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 8:10 AM Dröge, Gabriele <G.Droege@bgbm.orgmailto:G.Droege@bgbm.org> wrote: Hi Tim,
Thanks for the update. I would be interested to hear how to implement the enviro-packages in DwC. Maybe we can talk about it in the next IG meeting.
On the GBIF vocabulary page I can only find an extension that lists the package names, but it is unclear to me how to actually use the individual package terms. My first guess would be to create individual extensions for each enviro package.
Best, Gabi
Von: dwc-mixs [mailto:dwc-mixs-bouncesmailto:dwc-mixs-bounces@lists.tdwg.orghttp://lists.tdwg.org] Im Auftrag von Tim Robertson Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Mai 2021 13:03 An: dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.orgmailto:dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org Betreff: [dwc-mixs] DwC-A Extension roadmap
Hi all,
We discussed the outstanding DwC-A extension questions with Pier and have a proposed way forward. The motivation here is to keep the scope of the TG well-defined, and to progress exploratory activities that complement the work here.
1. Create a MIxS specific DwC-A Extension - Within the TDWG github - Containing only the fields of MIxS not covered by DwC - We will maintain a SSSOM mapping for the "covered" terms - This extension will be the reference showcasing the use of DwC and MIxS within a DwC-A for the report - Expected that TDWG / GSC will commit to maintain this with future changes in standards
2. GBIF create an additional DNA extension - In the GBIF schema repository (rs.gbif.orghttp://rs.gbif.org) - based on the MIxS Extension, but bringing in the additional terms necessary to satisfy the exchange needs of the GBIF/OBIS network - Documented in the description that it extends the MIxS one with a link - GBIF/OBIS progress with early adopters in data exchange, to be referred to in the report as a “case study” / example of use
3. Consider documenting other formats in the report - Ideas include the Frictionless Data, W3C CSV approach including a conversion to RDF
Please say if you have any comments or concerns, otherwise we’ll work through this in the coming weeks.
Many thanks, Tim _______________________________________________ dwc-mixs mailing list dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.orgmailto:dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/dwc-mixs
Yes, that's the spot!
Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------ Ramona L. Walls, Ph.D. Senior Scientific Analyst, CyVerse Assistant Research Professor, Bio5 Institute University of Arizona rwalls@cyverse.org Office: 329 Biosciences Research Laboratory Mail: 1657 East Helen St., Tucson, AZ 85721 Telephone: 520-626-1489 Fax: 520-626-4824
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Tim Robertson trobertson@gbif.org wrote:
Thanks Ramona
Yes, we will. Is https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/issues the best place please?
Thanks,
Tim
*From: *"Ramona L. Walls" rwalls@cyverse.org *Date: *Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 17.18 *To: *"Dröge, Gabriele" G.Droege@bgbm.org *Cc: *Tim Robertson trobertson@gbif.org, "dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org" < dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org> *Subject: *Re: [dwc-mixs] DwC-A Extension roadmap
Thank you for the update, Tim. Sorry I am not able to make these TG calls.
If GBIF needs new terms, would you consider submitting them for inclusion in MIxS? I know we are slow in making new releases, but we could get them in eventually, and with our new method, we should be able to release new terms without doing a full (annual) MIxS release.
Ramona
Ramona L. Walls, Ph.D. Senior Scientific Analyst, CyVerse
Assistant Research Professor, Bio5 Institute
University of Arizona
rwalls@cyverse.org Office: 329 Biosciences Research Laboratory
Mail: 1657 East Helen St., Tucson, AZ 85721
Telephone: 520-626-1489 Fax: 520-626-4824
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 8:10 AM Dröge, Gabriele G.Droege@bgbm.org wrote:
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the update. I would be interested to hear how to implement the enviro-packages in DwC. Maybe we can talk about it in the next IG meeting.
On the GBIF vocabulary page I can only find an extension that lists the package names, but it is unclear to me how to actually use the individual package terms. My first guess would be to create individual extensions for each enviro package.
Best,
Gabi
*Von:* dwc-mixs [mailto:dwc-mixs-bounces@lists.tdwg.org] *Im Auftrag von *Tim Robertson *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 11. Mai 2021 13:03 *An:* dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org *Betreff:* [dwc-mixs] DwC-A Extension roadmap
Hi all,
We discussed the outstanding DwC-A extension questions with Pier and have a proposed way forward.
The motivation here is to keep the scope of the TG well-defined, and to progress exploratory activities that complement the work here.
- Create a MIxS specific DwC-A Extension
Within the TDWG github
Containing only the fields of MIxS not covered by DwC
We will maintain a SSSOM mapping for the "covered" terms
This extension will be the reference showcasing the use of DwC and MIxS
within a DwC-A for the report
- Expected that TDWG / GSC will commit to maintain this with future
changes in standards
- GBIF create an additional DNA extension
In the GBIF schema repository (rs.gbif.org)
based on the MIxS Extension, but bringing in the additional terms
necessary to satisfy the exchange needs of the GBIF/OBIS network
Documented in the description that it extends the MIxS one with a link
GBIF/OBIS progress with early adopters in data exchange, to be referred
to in the report as a “case study” / example of use
- Consider documenting other formats in the report
- Ideas include the Frictionless Data, W3C CSV approach including a
conversion to RDF
Please say if you have any comments or concerns, otherwise we’ll work through this in the coming weeks.
Many thanks,
Tim
dwc-mixs mailing list dwc-mixs@lists.tdwg.org http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/dwc-mixs
participants (3)
-
Dröge, Gabriele -
Ramona L. Walls -
Tim Robertson