I think developing or maintaining the documentation in the GitHub a good suggestion, but perhaps after we get some larger decisions made, like the basic structure -- what content should be in which files -- and also when things slow down. I have always had difficulties with simultaneous edits on GitHub. I'll be happy to move this into the repo after people have had a chance to bash make some edits or suggestions.

I hope we can talk about this at our next meeting.

-Stan

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 4:35 AM Bölling, Christian <Christian.Boelling@mfn.berlin> wrote:

While I do appreciate the agility of Google Docs I would like to suggest to at least consider the possibility of using the repository itself for generating documents. The possibility to maintain different versions of a document to pursue different ideas or work on specific parts of a document (via branches) and for establishing consensus (via merge requests) with the ability to link to issues and document the process directly is a plus from my point of view. There is a learning curve to using the repo like this, but git / GitHub is very well equipped to do this.

--- Christian

Von: dwc-material-sample <dwc-material-sample-bounces@lists.tdwg.org> Im Auftrag von Stan Blum
Gesendet: Montag, 15. November 2021 10:42
An: dwc-material-sample@lists.tdwg.org
Betreff: [EXT] [dwc-material-sample] New doc in existing foler

Oops, I now see that Teresa had already created a folder for us back when we got started.

The doc I spoke of is now in that folder. Find it under

Shared with me / TDWG_MaterialSample / Organism Occurrence MaterialSample

Cheers,

-Stan

_______________________________________________
dwc-material-sample mailing list
dwc-material-sample@lists.tdwg.org
http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/dwc-material-sample