Thanks, Kevin. I agree that this is very sensible, and I'll update the description on the wiki accordingly Donald --------------------------------------------------------------- Donald Hobern (dhobern@gbif.org) Programme Officer for Data Access and Database Interoperability Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Tel: +45-35321483 Mobile: +45-28751483 Fax: +45-35321480 --------------------------------------------------------------- _____ From: Taxonomic Databases Working Group GUID Project [mailto:TDWG-GUID@LISTSERV.NHM.KU.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin Richards Sent: 26 February 2006 20:56 To: TDWG-GUID@LISTSERV.NHM.KU.EDU Subject: Re: Task 9: LSID Resolver Namespaces (or should it be Authority Identifications) I believe this topic should cover both LSID namespaces and authority names. These are very related topics and the best practices for one greatly influences the best practices for the other, ie if you decide that it is best that authority names use sub-domains to a specific level, eg names.indexfungorum.org (not the best example I know but it illustrates the point), then less namespacing is required for the "namespace" part of the LSID. (All this assumes opacity - I see it as just "reccommendations" on how to divide your namespacing over the authority name and namespace parts of the LSID). Kevin

...

...

ricardo@TDWG.ORG 25/02/2006 6:11 a.m. >>>

Donald Hobern wrote:

*_9. LSID Resolver Namespaces_** (http://wiki.gbif.org/guidwiki/wikka.php?wakka=LSIDResolverNamespaces) *

This is a starting-point for discussion of best practices in using DNS entries for LSID resolution services.

Donald, I believe that the definition of this task and its name do not match. I think it is a terminology problem. The part of the LSID that is related to DNS is the *authority identification*. The *namespace* isn't related to DNS. here's the LSID syntax to illustrate: urn:lsid:authority_identification:namespace:identifier:revision. So, this group will discuss authority ids or namespaces (or both)? Which should we fix, the page name or the description? I think I have already mixed this up in a previous post to Kevin Richards. Sorry about that. Regards, Ricardo ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WARNING: This email and any attachments may be confidential and/or privileged. They are intended for the addressee only and are not to be read, used, copied or disseminated by anyone receiving them in error. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and delete this message and any attachments. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the official views of Landcare Research. Landcare Research http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++