Thank you everyone :-)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:39 AM, "Markus Döring (GBIF)" <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mdoering@gbif.org">mdoering@gbif.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<a href="http://data.gbif.org/ws/rest/occurrence/get/1003321" target="_blank">http://data.gbif.org/ws/rest/occurrence/get/1003321</a><br></blockquote><div> </div><div>This I like :-)</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
<a href="http://darwincore.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/terms/index.htm" target="_blank">http://darwincore.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/terms/index.htm</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I will look through this and the examples and try to get my stuff to follow it.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Personally I think this is a far more important issue than having<br>
globally unique ids.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, I agree. Also I think it is something that could move forward quickly with less controversy.</div><div><div><div class="h5"><br></div><div class="h5">Thanks again,</div>
<div class="h5"><br></div><div class="h5">- Pete</div></div></div></div>