[tdwg-tag] RDF/OWL Good Practices Task Group

Nico Cellinese ncellinese at flmnh.ufl.edu
Tue Oct 4 23:15:05 CEST 2011


Hi Pete,

There are no Kings or Queens in TDWG. Well, maybe a few princesses.  However, if you lock yourself in the dungeon there is very little we can do. Please, don't throw the key away in the crocodile pond around your own castle. Nobody is going to swim in there. I'll be happy to come and rescue you from yourself as I think you are truly victimizing yourself unnecessarily. Nobody has an agenda. Ideas come and go, they are revisited, rehashed, recycled over and over until maybe a seed germinates, and yes, sometimes in someone's else backyard.  You can jump in and help, contribute, fertilize, make it grow better instead of whining. We heard the same stuff over and over again.  It was about LOD at some point.  There are no EGOs here but your own, clearly lost in self pity.  TDWG loves you. Everyone loves the contribution you, all of us, can provide.  It was really great to see you last year in Woods Hole. Come back!! We want you there!

Nico

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:11:31 -0500
> From: Peter DeVries <pete.devries at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [tdwg-tag] RDF/OWL Good Practices Task Group
> To: joel sachs <jsachs at csee.umbc.edu>
> Cc: tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAE0MQeEcB2_Cdcj18_0esYu96qgwW-thK8+gZm8bz-nXN9W-1g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Hi TDWG'ers,
> 
> I thought it would be good to explain in a different way how I see TDWG
> functioning.
> 
> There are people who take pride in their intellect.
> 
> If it turns out that they are wrong they can experience a form of cognitive
> dissonance.
> 
> The either consciously or unconsciously convince themselves that the
> original person taking the "correct side" was wrong, or that they had
> actually heard it somewhere else (they were never on the "wrong" side)
> 
> In some cases, they are aware of what they are doing and actively try to
> punish or exclude the person who "corrected" them.
> 
> In the tale "The Emperor's New Clothes" (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor's_New_Clothes )
> 
> a child spoke up while others remained silent - afraid of what might happen
> to them if the told the King the truth.
> 
> The reason this is popular tale has been translated into 100 languages, is
> that this kind of behavior is so common.
> 
> The irony is that not about intellect. but emotions.
> 
> Has anyone else on this list had the experience of be punished after
> correctly pointing out a flaw in someone else's logic?
> 
> Is this behavior at odds with the goals and best interests of the group?
> 
> I am concerned that there is only place in TDWG for the Kings and those that
> allow them to keep there Ego's happy.
> 
> Respectfully,
> 
> - Pete
> 
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:46 PM, joel sachs <jsachs at csee.umbc.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Greetings everyone,
>> 
>> After some back and forth amongst Steve Baskauf, myself, Greg Whitbread,
>> and the executive, we've decided to move forward with an RDF/OWL task
>> group, convened under the TAG. Our task will be to deliver a document
>> comprising
>> i. use cases and competency questions;
>> ii. well documented examples of addressing those use cases via rdf and
>> sparql; and
>> iii. discussion of advantages and disadvantages of the approaches
>> illustrated by the examples.
>> 
>> Our draft charter is at
>> http://code.google.com/p/tdwg-rdf/wiki/CharterOfTG
>> and we welcome comments, suggestions, and better ideas. One area where
>> we're still open is the question of whether or not our deliverable should
>> be an official Best Current Practice document [1]. The charter reflects
>> our current feeling that it should not. After we deliver our "book of use
>> cases and examples", options would include being re-chartered by the TAG
>> to produce a best practices document, spinning off as a "Semantic Web
>> Interest Group", or disbanding (either in triumph or despair).
>> 
>> When we were planning to convene as an Interest Group, several of you
>> accepted our invitation to serve as core members, and we hope that
>> convening as a Task Group does not change your willingness to do so. If
>> you would like to be a core member of the group, and we haven't yet
>> contacted you, there's a good chance that we will. But don't wait! Feel
>> free to volunteer for core membership. (And recall that you don't have to
>> be a "core member to" contribute.)
>> 
>> In regards timeline, I'd like to incorporate any feedback we receive, and
>> submit the charter to the executive at the end of this week, in hopes of
>> being chartered by New Orleans.
>> 
>> Many thanks!
>> Joel.
>> 
>> 1. http://www.tdwg.org/standards/status-and-categories/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tdwg-tag mailing list
>> tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
>> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pete DeVries
> Department of Entomology
> University of Wisconsin - Madison
> 445 Russell Laboratories
> 1630 Linden Drive
> Madison, WI 53706
> Email: pdevries at wisc.edu
> TaxonConcept <http://www.taxonconcept.org/>  &
> GeoSpecies<http://about.geospecies.org/> Knowledge
> Bases
> A Semantic Web, Linked Open Data <http://linkeddata.org/>  Project
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-tag/attachments/20110928/969f664f/attachment-0001.html 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:25:06 -0400
> From: Hilmar Lapp <hlapp at nescent.org>
> Subject: Re: [tdwg-tag] RDF/OWL Good Practices Task Group
> To: Peter DeVries <pete.devries at gmail.com>
> Cc: tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
> Message-ID: <F994F2CC-6BFD-4AA1-AD58-4A8D034D7997 at nescent.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Pete -
> 
> let me just steal a quote from the numerous people who must have  
> stated this before in some form or another: When you set something  
> free, it's free. It is no longer yours to control.
> 
> While I think most or all of us understand this very well for open- 
> source and certainly for public-domain software source code, this is  
> as true for publishing (freeing) data, and certainly as much for  
> freeing knowledge and ideas. If you put an idea out on a public  
> discussion forum, you've set your idea free. You've set it free for  
> others to reuse in whatever form they see fit. That's the power of  
> openness in advancing science, whether by open-sourcing code,  
> publishing data under CC0, or posting ideas on blogs (let alone  
> mailing lists).
> 
> If you don't want your ideas reused, or can only tolerate certain  
> kinds of reuses but not others, then keep them to yourself. In my  
> mind, open groups such as mailing lists, and the TDWG interest groups  
> for that matter, are for merciless reuse, within the confines of  
> common professional ethics. There is nothing unethical, in my mind, if  
> someone were stimulated or persuaded by your efforts to change their  
> mind on something, even if to the extent that they now vigorously  
> argue that new standpoint as their own. What could be more convincing  
> about the merits of the efforts that led to that. If that's something  
> you can say you've accomplished within TDWG, I'd be very proud of it;  
> it's certainly much more than I ever have.
> 
> We all know the saying of plagiarism being the sincerest form of  
> flattery. In that sense, if I ever got someone in TDWG to copy an idea  
> of mine and reproduce it as their own, it'd be one of my proudest  
> moments (unless, of course, it were one of my numerous bad ideas).  
> This isn't about you or me or us, Pete - at least as far as I'm  
> concerned the reason I'm in here is to advance our knowledge of  
> biodiversity so that in the end this world becomes a better place. If  
> in order to get there it takes someone else copying my idea as theirs,  
> that's fine - it won't dampen my energy for a second.
> 
> And no, I won't say anything further on this matter - to me, it's just  
> really a huge distraction from what we, including you, Pete, can  
> really contribute to the group.
> 
> 	-hilmar
> 
> On Sep 28, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Peter DeVries wrote:
> 
>> Hi TDWG'ers,
>> 
>> I thought it would be good to explain in a different way how I see  
>> TDWG functioning.
>> 
>> There are people who take pride in their intellect.
>> 
>> If it turns out that they are wrong they can experience a form of  
>> cognitive dissonance.
>> 
>> The either consciously or unconsciously convince themselves that the  
>> original person taking the "correct side" was wrong, or that they  
>> had actually heard it somewhere else (they were never on the "wrong"  
>> side)
>> 
>> In some cases, they are aware of what they are doing and actively  
>> try to punish or exclude the person who "corrected" them.
>> 
>> In the tale "The Emperor's New Clothes" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor's_New_Clothes 
>> )
>> 
>> a child spoke up while others remained silent - afraid of what might  
>> happen to them if the told the King the truth.
>> 
>> The reason this is popular tale has been translated into 100  
>> languages, is that this kind of behavior is so common.
>> 
>> The irony is that not about intellect. but emotions.
>> 
>> Has anyone else on this list had the experience of be punished after  
>> correctly pointing out a flaw in someone else's logic?
>> 
>> Is this behavior at odds with the goals and best interests of the  
>> group?
>> 
>> I am concerned that there is only place in TDWG for the Kings and  
>> those that allow them to keep there Ego's happy.
>> 
>> Respectfully,
>> 
>> - Pete
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:46 PM, joel sachs <jsachs at csee.umbc.edu>  
>> wrote:
>> Greetings everyone,
>> 
>> After some back and forth amongst Steve Baskauf, myself, Greg  
>> Whitbread,
>> and the executive, we've decided to move forward with an RDF/OWL task
>> group, convened under the TAG. Our task will be to deliver a document
>> comprising
>> i. use cases and competency questions;
>> ii. well documented examples of addressing those use cases via rdf and
>> sparql; and
>> iii. discussion of advantages and disadvantages of the approaches
>> illustrated by the examples.
>> 
>> Our draft charter is at
>> http://code.google.com/p/tdwg-rdf/wiki/CharterOfTG
>> and we welcome comments, suggestions, and better ideas. One area where
>> we're still open is the question of whether or not our deliverable  
>> should
>> be an official Best Current Practice document [1]. The charter  
>> reflects
>> our current feeling that it should not. After we deliver our "book  
>> of use
>> cases and examples", options would include being re-chartered by the  
>> TAG
>> to produce a best practices document, spinning off as a "Semantic Web
>> Interest Group", or disbanding (either in triumph or despair).
>> 
>> When we were planning to convene as an Interest Group, several of you
>> accepted our invitation to serve as core members, and we hope that
>> convening as a Task Group does not change your willingness to do so.  
>> If
>> you would like to be a core member of the group, and we haven't yet
>> contacted you, there's a good chance that we will. But don't wait!  
>> Feel
>> free to volunteer for core membership. (And recall that you don't  
>> have to
>> be a "core member to" contribute.)
>> 
>> In regards timeline, I'd like to incorporate any feedback we  
>> receive, and
>> submit the charter to the executive at the end of this week, in  
>> hopes of
>> being chartered by New Orleans.
>> 
>> Many thanks!
>> Joel.
>> 
>> 1. http://www.tdwg.org/standards/status-and-categories/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tdwg-tag mailing list
>> tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
>> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Pete DeVries
>> Department of Entomology
>> University of Wisconsin - Madison
>> 445 Russell Laboratories
>> 1630 Linden Drive
>> Madison, WI 53706
>> Email: pdevries at wisc.edu
>> TaxonConcept  &  GeoSpecies Knowledge Bases
>> A Semantic Web, Linked Open Data  Project
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> tdwg-tag mailing list
>> tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
>> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
> 
> -- 
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp  -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org :
> ===========================================================
> 
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-tag/attachments/20110928/ce782380/attachment-0001.html 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tag mailing list
> tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
> 
> 
> End of tdwg-tag Digest, Vol 59, Issue 19
> ****************************************

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Nico Cellinese, Ph.D.
Assistant Curator, Botany & Informatics
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Biology

Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
354 Dickinson Hall, PO Box 117800
Gainesville, FL 32611-7800, U.S.A.
Tel. 352-273-1979
Fax 352-846-1861
http://cellinese.blogspot.com/



More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list