[tdwg-tag] DC: was Re: Re-organisation of TDWG Ontology: Danger silence will == acquiescence!

Bob Morris morris.bob at gmail.com
Tue May 12 16:28:55 CEST 2009


Sometimes DC works and sometimes it doesn't.  See
http://www.keytonature.eu/wiki/MRTG_Schema_v0.7 where we spent and continue
to spend a lot of effort to sort out (in the case of multimedia resources)
what does and doesn't.   I hope people will join that discussion.  At the
simplest level, what we do is use DC (and other standards) URI's for the URI
of the term we are adopting.  Some DC remains very vague and sloppy, even in
the 2008 revision.  The current "controversy" on the MRTG wiki is whether
too much complexity gets introduced by trying to provide for data
provenance. To me, this is an issue very important for science data, but
only somewhat so in the communities classically served by DC---the cultural
artifacts community possibly being the biggest exception.

Bob


On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Roderic Page <r.page at bio.gla.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear Roger,
> This is probably off topic (and maybe I missed something), but it really
> worries me that much of the TDWG vocabulary is unique to TDWG. Journal
> publishers are busy pumping out Dublin Core and PRISM (sometimes with FOAF).
> I'm trying to link this to records nomenclators pump out. I seem to recall
> some statement that where possible TDWG would reuse existing vocabularies,
> but I don't see this happening. In the meantime, I'm busy mapping our
> idiosyncratic vocabulary to that used by publishers.
>
> Regards
>
> Rod
>
>
>
>
> On 12 May 2009, at 09:59, Roger Hyam wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I need to do some work on the Taxon Name and Taxon Concept vocabularies and
> believe I have come up with a good way of organising the TDWG ontology space
> (everything within http:/rs.tdwg.org/ontology).
>
> The following are the changes I suggest:
>
>
>    - All files should be OWL DL compliant
>    - All files should be openable in Protege 4 (I believe this is now good
>    enough to use for editing these small ontologies)
>    - We take a highly structured modular approach I call this the Bricks
>    and Mortar design pattern
>       - Some files are 'Bricks' and as such *import or reference no other
>       files, classes or individuals*. e.g. TaxonName does not mention a
>       higher 'Name' object in the class hierarchy.
>       - Other files are 'Mortar'. These files import Bricks and stipulate
>       relationships between things. Because we are using OWL it is easy to define
>       things like the class hierarchy or the range of a property in a separate
>       file to the file the original class or property was defined in.
>       - This pattern gives us maximum re-usability as the same Brick could
>       be used in different ways. It does not bind us to any one implementation of
>       one object.
>       - An example of the usage pattern would be to define TaxonName,
>       TaxonConcept, Rank, NomenclaturalCode as separate bricks that don't
>       reference each other at all then create a TCS ontology that imports these 4
>       bricks and defines their relationships.
>    - We move to some other method of presenting the ontologies on line -
>    possibly the OWLDoc plug-in for Protege. This would lose us the branded look
>    we have at the moment but would be more flexible and consistent in the long
>    run.
>
>
> As I need to do this for the TaxonName TaxonConcept vocabularies I
> volunteer to do manage the space this year if people are happy going down
> this route.
>
> From the point of view of deployed systems (the nomenclators) there may be
> a need for a namespace change on some properties but I would review what is
> in use and this would be trivial - if necessary at all.
>
> What do you think? I will take silence as acquiescence on the grounds that
> any movement is better than none -  though I don't suppose I will get round
> to doing anything about changes till after e-Biosphere in June.
>
> All the best,
>
> Roger
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>  Roger Hyam - Project Officer WP4
>  Pan European Species Infrastructure
>  +44 75 90 60 80 16
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tag mailing list
> tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Roderic Page
> Professor of Taxonomy
> DEEB, FBLS
> Graham Kerr Building
> University of Glasgow
> Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
>
> Email: r.page at bio.gla.ac.uk
> Tel: +44 141 330 4778
> Fax: +44 141 330 2792
> AIM: rodpage1962 at aim.com
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1112517192
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rdmpage
> Blog: http://iphylo.blogspot.com
> Home page: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tag mailing list
> tdwg-tag at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tag
>
>


-- 
Robert A. Morris
Professor of Computer Science
UMASS-Boston
ram at cs.umb.edu
http://bdei.cs.umb.edu/
http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram/calendar.html
phone (+1)617 287 6466
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-tag/attachments/20090512/65ad6568/attachment.html 


More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list