[tdwg-tag] Embedding specimen (and other) annotations in NeXML
Hilmar Lapp
hlapp at duke.edu
Sun Feb 22 23:44:04 CET 2009
Well they prevent the ontology from loading in Protege. Are you saying
that the java.net.URI parser has a bug?
-hilmar
On Feb 22, 2009, at 5:34 PM, John R. WIECZOREK wrote:
> Those URIs will not resolve, they are URIs to elements that only ever
> appeared in XML schemas in the past. They are needed in there for
> completeness.
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Hilmar Lapp <hlapp at duke.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 22, 2009, at 5:12 PM, John R. WIECZOREK wrote:
>>
>>> Just a quick answer right now to point you to rdf for the DwC
>>> (similar
>>> to Dublin Core's rdf) that has just begun the review process as a
>>> TDWG
>>> Standard.
>>>
>>> http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/rdf/dwcterms.rdf
>>>
>>
>>
>> Awesome! This is going to be really useful I think.
>>
>> -hilmar
>>
>> BTW the file at the above URL doesn't parse (at least not in
>> Protege).
>>
>> "[line=127:column=796] URI
>> 'http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/curatorial/YearIdentified-2003-06-17,
>> MonthIdentified-2003-06-17, DayIdentified-2003-06-17' cannot be
>> resolved
>> against curent base URI http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/rdf/dwcterms.rdf"
>>
>> (The root exception is java.net.URISyntaxException: Illegal
>> character in
>> path at index 60:
>> http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/curatorial/YearIdentified-2003-06-17,
>> MonthIdentified-2003-06-17, DayIdentified-2003-06-17)
>>
>> --
>> ===========================================================
>> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
>> ===========================================================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
===========================================================
More information about the tdwg-tag
mailing list